Conceptualizing relations between instructional guidance infrastructure (IGI) and teachers’ beliefs about mathematics instruction: Regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive considerations

Megan Hopkins*, James P Spillane

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Scholars have become increasingly interested in what is often referred to as the instructional guidance infrastructure (IGI). Research has identified the characteristics of infrastructures that make them more or less influential in guiding teachers’ instruction, such as alignment, authority, and prescriptiveness. Although these are important, a key question is whether and how IGIs work to influence teachers’ beliefs and practices. We use new institutional theory to theorize relations between IGIs and teachers’ beliefs about how students learn mathematics in two local school systems undergoing instructional reform. Based on new institutional theory, we explore how the three pillars of institutions—regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive—worked in interaction to shape teachers’ beliefs. In doing so, we develop a more comprehensive framework for examining IGIs and how they operate.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)421-450
Number of pages30
JournalJournal of Educational Change
Volume16
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2015

Keywords

  • District reform
  • Instructional guidance infrastructure
  • New institutional theory
  • Teacher beliefs

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptualizing relations between instructional guidance infrastructure (IGI) and teachers’ beliefs about mathematics instruction: Regulative, normative, and cultural-cognitive considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this