TY - JOUR
T1 - Conducting a multicentre and multinational qualitative study on patient transitions
AU - Johnson, Julie K.
AU - Barach, Paul
AU - Vernooij-Dassen, Myrra
PY - 2012/12
Y1 - 2012/12
N2 - Background: A multicentre, multinational research study requires careful planning and coordination to accomplish the aims of the study and to ensure systematic and rigorous examination of all project methods and data collected. Objective: The aim of this paper is to describe the approach we used during the HANDOVER Project to develop a multicentre, multinational research project for studying transitions of patient care while creating a community of practice for the researchers. Method: We highlight the process used to assure the quality of a multicentre qualitative study and to create a codebook for data analysis as examples of attending to the community of practice while conducting rigorous qualitative research. Findings: Essential elements for the success of this multinational, multilanguage research project included recruiting a strong research team, explicit planning for decision-making processes to be used throughout the project, acknowledging the differences among the study settings and planning the protocols to capitalise upon those differences. Conclusions: Although not commonly discussed in reports of large research projects, there is an underlying, concurrent stream of activities to develop a cohesive team that trusts and respects one another's skills and that engage independent researchers in a group process that contributes to achieving study goals. We discuss other lessons learned and offer recommendations for other teams planning multicentre research.
AB - Background: A multicentre, multinational research study requires careful planning and coordination to accomplish the aims of the study and to ensure systematic and rigorous examination of all project methods and data collected. Objective: The aim of this paper is to describe the approach we used during the HANDOVER Project to develop a multicentre, multinational research project for studying transitions of patient care while creating a community of practice for the researchers. Method: We highlight the process used to assure the quality of a multicentre qualitative study and to create a codebook for data analysis as examples of attending to the community of practice while conducting rigorous qualitative research. Findings: Essential elements for the success of this multinational, multilanguage research project included recruiting a strong research team, explicit planning for decision-making processes to be used throughout the project, acknowledging the differences among the study settings and planning the protocols to capitalise upon those differences. Conclusions: Although not commonly discussed in reports of large research projects, there is an underlying, concurrent stream of activities to develop a cohesive team that trusts and respects one another's skills and that engage independent researchers in a group process that contributes to achieving study goals. We discuss other lessons learned and offer recommendations for other teams planning multicentre research.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871925994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871925994&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001197
DO - 10.1136/bmjqs-2012-001197
M3 - Article
C2 - 23100548
AN - SCOPUS:84871925994
SN - 2044-5415
VL - 21
SP - i22-i28
JO - BMJ Quality and Safety
JF - BMJ Quality and Safety
IS - SUPPL. 1
ER -