TY - JOUR
T1 - Consensus Statement for Protocols of Factorial Randomized Trials Extension of the SPIRIT 2013 Statement
AU - Kahan, Brennan C.
AU - Hall, Sophie S.
AU - Beller, Elaine M.
AU - Birchenall, Megan
AU - Elbourne, Diana
AU - Juszczak, Edmund
AU - Little, Paul
AU - Fletcher, John
AU - Golub, Robert M.
AU - Goulao, Beatriz
AU - Hopewell, Sally
AU - Islam, Nazrul
AU - Zwarenstein, Merrick
AU - Chan, An Wen
AU - Montgomery, Alan A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - IMPORTANCE Trial protocols outline a trial’s objectives as well as the methods (design, conduct, and analysis) that will be used to meet those objectives, and transparent reporting of trial protocols ensures objectives are clear and facilitates appraisal regarding the suitability of study methods. Factorial trials, in which 2 or more interventions are assessed in the same set of participants, have unique methodological considerations. However, no extension of the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Statement, which provides guidance on reporting of trial protocols, for factorial trials is available. OBJECTIVE To develop a consensus-based extension to the SPIRIT 2013 Statement for factorial trials. EVIDENCE REVIEW The SPIRIT extension for factorial trials was developed using the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) methodological framework. First, a list of reporting recommendations was generated using a scoping review of methodological articles identified using a MEDLINE search (inception to May 2019), which was supplemented with relevant articles from the personal collections of the authors. Second, a 3-round Delphi survey (January to June 2022, completed by 104 panelists from 14 countries) was conducted to assess the importance of items and identify additional recommendations. Third, a hybrid consensus meeting was held, attended by 15 panelists to finalize selection and wording of the checklist. FINDINGS This SPIRIT extension for factorial trials modified 9 of the 33 items in the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. Key reporting recommendations were that the rationale for using a factorial design should be provided, including whether an interaction is hypothesized; the treatment groups that will form the main comparisons should be identified; and statistical methods for each main comparison should be provided, including how interactions will be assessed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this consensus statement, 9 factorial-specific items were provided that should be addressed in all protocols of factorial trials to increase the trial’s utility and transparency.
AB - IMPORTANCE Trial protocols outline a trial’s objectives as well as the methods (design, conduct, and analysis) that will be used to meet those objectives, and transparent reporting of trial protocols ensures objectives are clear and facilitates appraisal regarding the suitability of study methods. Factorial trials, in which 2 or more interventions are assessed in the same set of participants, have unique methodological considerations. However, no extension of the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) 2013 Statement, which provides guidance on reporting of trial protocols, for factorial trials is available. OBJECTIVE To develop a consensus-based extension to the SPIRIT 2013 Statement for factorial trials. EVIDENCE REVIEW The SPIRIT extension for factorial trials was developed using the Enhancing the Quality and Transparency of Health Research (EQUATOR) methodological framework. First, a list of reporting recommendations was generated using a scoping review of methodological articles identified using a MEDLINE search (inception to May 2019), which was supplemented with relevant articles from the personal collections of the authors. Second, a 3-round Delphi survey (January to June 2022, completed by 104 panelists from 14 countries) was conducted to assess the importance of items and identify additional recommendations. Third, a hybrid consensus meeting was held, attended by 15 panelists to finalize selection and wording of the checklist. FINDINGS This SPIRIT extension for factorial trials modified 9 of the 33 items in the SPIRIT 2013 checklist. Key reporting recommendations were that the rationale for using a factorial design should be provided, including whether an interaction is hypothesized; the treatment groups that will form the main comparisons should be identified; and statistical methods for each main comparison should be provided, including how interactions will be assessed. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this consensus statement, 9 factorial-specific items were provided that should be addressed in all protocols of factorial trials to increase the trial’s utility and transparency.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85178850598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85178850598&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46121
DO - 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.46121
M3 - Review article
C2 - 38051535
AN - SCOPUS:85178850598
SN - 2574-3805
SP - E2346121
JO - JAMA network open
JF - JAMA network open
ER -