Constitutional Interpretation

Robert W. Bennett*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Contemporary debates about constitutional interpretation in the United States seem fixated on what is called 'originalism', the view that, regardless of when some constitutional issue arises, guidance for resolving it is to be sought in 'original' sources, those which accompanied the promulgation of the constitutional language in question. The apparent alternative is 'living constitutionalism', in which a large dose of judicial discretion keeps constitutional interpretation in touch with a changing world. This is seen by originalists as relegating ill-defined responsibility to the doubtful authority of the judiciary. Originalists invoke the writtenness of the Constitution, the desirability of stability in the law, specific constitutional provision for amendments as signaling the acceptable mechanism for change, and the tenuous democratic credentials of life-tenured federal judges to depict originalism as the right approach to constitutional interpretation, and living constitutionalism as misbegotten. This article provides an overview of originalism and living constitutionalism. It first discusses constitutional language and original intention before focusing on the summing problem, degrees of generality of language, degrees of generality of intentions, unforeseen problems, and constitutional amendments.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationThe Oxford Handbook of Language and Law
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780191750694
ISBN (Print)9780199572120
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 21 2012

Fingerprint

constitutionalism
interpretation
language
constitutional amendment
judiciary
amendment
constitution
responsibility
Law
Originalism
Constitutional Interpretation
Language
Constitutionalism
Generality
Intentions

Keywords

  • Constitutional amendments
  • Constitutional interpretation
  • Constitutional language
  • Law
  • Living constitutionalism
  • Original intention
  • Originalism
  • Summing problem
  • United States

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities(all)
  • Social Sciences(all)

Cite this

Bennett, R. W. (2012). Constitutional Interpretation. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0009
Bennett, Robert W. / Constitutional Interpretation. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford University Press, 2012.
@inbook{6cd7c1b9e3f14ae3b6ceb29091a4ce4a,
title = "Constitutional Interpretation",
abstract = "Contemporary debates about constitutional interpretation in the United States seem fixated on what is called 'originalism', the view that, regardless of when some constitutional issue arises, guidance for resolving it is to be sought in 'original' sources, those which accompanied the promulgation of the constitutional language in question. The apparent alternative is 'living constitutionalism', in which a large dose of judicial discretion keeps constitutional interpretation in touch with a changing world. This is seen by originalists as relegating ill-defined responsibility to the doubtful authority of the judiciary. Originalists invoke the writtenness of the Constitution, the desirability of stability in the law, specific constitutional provision for amendments as signaling the acceptable mechanism for change, and the tenuous democratic credentials of life-tenured federal judges to depict originalism as the right approach to constitutional interpretation, and living constitutionalism as misbegotten. This article provides an overview of originalism and living constitutionalism. It first discusses constitutional language and original intention before focusing on the summing problem, degrees of generality of language, degrees of generality of intentions, unforeseen problems, and constitutional amendments.",
keywords = "Constitutional amendments, Constitutional interpretation, Constitutional language, Law, Living constitutionalism, Original intention, Originalism, Summing problem, United States",
author = "Bennett, {Robert W.}",
year = "2012",
month = "11",
day = "21",
doi = "10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0009",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199572120",
booktitle = "The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United States",

}

Bennett, RW 2012, Constitutional Interpretation. in The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0009

Constitutional Interpretation. / Bennett, Robert W.

The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford University Press, 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Constitutional Interpretation

AU - Bennett, Robert W.

PY - 2012/11/21

Y1 - 2012/11/21

N2 - Contemporary debates about constitutional interpretation in the United States seem fixated on what is called 'originalism', the view that, regardless of when some constitutional issue arises, guidance for resolving it is to be sought in 'original' sources, those which accompanied the promulgation of the constitutional language in question. The apparent alternative is 'living constitutionalism', in which a large dose of judicial discretion keeps constitutional interpretation in touch with a changing world. This is seen by originalists as relegating ill-defined responsibility to the doubtful authority of the judiciary. Originalists invoke the writtenness of the Constitution, the desirability of stability in the law, specific constitutional provision for amendments as signaling the acceptable mechanism for change, and the tenuous democratic credentials of life-tenured federal judges to depict originalism as the right approach to constitutional interpretation, and living constitutionalism as misbegotten. This article provides an overview of originalism and living constitutionalism. It first discusses constitutional language and original intention before focusing on the summing problem, degrees of generality of language, degrees of generality of intentions, unforeseen problems, and constitutional amendments.

AB - Contemporary debates about constitutional interpretation in the United States seem fixated on what is called 'originalism', the view that, regardless of when some constitutional issue arises, guidance for resolving it is to be sought in 'original' sources, those which accompanied the promulgation of the constitutional language in question. The apparent alternative is 'living constitutionalism', in which a large dose of judicial discretion keeps constitutional interpretation in touch with a changing world. This is seen by originalists as relegating ill-defined responsibility to the doubtful authority of the judiciary. Originalists invoke the writtenness of the Constitution, the desirability of stability in the law, specific constitutional provision for amendments as signaling the acceptable mechanism for change, and the tenuous democratic credentials of life-tenured federal judges to depict originalism as the right approach to constitutional interpretation, and living constitutionalism as misbegotten. This article provides an overview of originalism and living constitutionalism. It first discusses constitutional language and original intention before focusing on the summing problem, degrees of generality of language, degrees of generality of intentions, unforeseen problems, and constitutional amendments.

KW - Constitutional amendments

KW - Constitutional interpretation

KW - Constitutional language

KW - Law

KW - Living constitutionalism

KW - Original intention

KW - Originalism

KW - Summing problem

KW - United States

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924598865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924598865&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0009

DO - 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0009

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84924598865

SN - 9780199572120

BT - The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -

Bennett RW. Constitutional Interpretation. In The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law. Oxford University Press. 2012 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199572120.013.0009