Construct Validity and Content Analysis

Dan P. McAdams, Peter B. Zeldow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

We clarify points of agreement and disagreement with Schnurr, Rosenberg, and Oxman, as put forth in their article appearing this issue. Speech samples elicited under different conditions may or may not be interchangeable. This is a matter of empirical research, but it is also dependent upon the meaningfulness of the content categories used in the analysis. We prefer a theory-driven, construct validational approach that: employs well validated coding schemes to assess psychologically meaningful concepts.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)243-245
Number of pages3
JournalJournal of Personality Assessment
Volume61
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental health
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Construct Validity and Content Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this