TY - JOUR
T1 - Contemporary Cardiovascular Device Clinical Trials (Trends and Patterns 2001 to 2012)
AU - Vaduganathan, Muthiah
AU - Tahhan, Ayman S.
AU - Greene, Stephen J.
AU - Kelkar, Anita A.
AU - Georgiopoulou, Vasiliki V.
AU - Kalogeropoulos, Andreas P.
AU - Fonarow, Gregg C.
AU - Gheorghiade, Mihai
AU - Butler, Javed
N1 - Funding Information:
The authors had full access to the data, take responsibility for its integrity, and had complete control and authority over manuscript preparation and the decision to publish. Dr. Fonarow reports research support from the National Institutes of Health and consultant to Gambro and Medtronic. Dr. Gheorghiade reports relations with Abbott, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardiorentis, CorThera, Cytokinetics, CytoPherx, DebioPharm, Errekappa Terapeutici, GlaxoSmithKline, Ikaria, Intersection Medical, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Merck, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Otsuka, Palatin Technologies, Pericor Therapeutics, Protein Design, Sanofi-Aventis, Sigma Tau, Solvay, Sticares InterACT, Takeda, and Trevena. Dr. Butler reports research support from the National Institutes of Health and the European Union and is a consultant to Amgen, Bayer, BG Medicine, Celladon, Gambro, GE Healthcare, Harvest, Medtronic, Ono Pharma, Stemedica, and Trevena. All other authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2015/7/15
Y1 - 2015/7/15
N2 - Device uptake and development have progressed over the last decade, but few quantitative data exist examining the overall operating characteristics and temporal trends of these clinical trials. We performed a systematic analysis of all cardiovascular device clinical trials from 2001 to 2012 published in medical and cardiovascular journals with the 8 highest impact factors. Of the 1,224 identified cardiovascular clinical trials, 299 (24.4%) focused specifically on devices. Each trial included a median of 335 patients (162 to 745) recruited from a median of 14 sites (3 to 38) over a median enrollment duration of 1.9 years (1.2 to 3.3). Median enrollment rate was 1.1 patients/site/month (0.5 to 4.2). Most device trials targeted coronary artery disease (55.2%), followed by arrhythmias (17.4%). Most were industry sponsored (53.6%) and included mortality as a primary end point (69.6%). The median number of patients (225 to 499, p <0.001 for trend) and enrolling sites (11 to 19, p = 0.07 for trend) increased from 2001 to 2012. During the study period, multinational enrollment grew and approached 50% (p = 0.03), whereas trials enrolling in North America exclusively decreased from 30% to 17% (p = 0.10 for trend). Approximately 70% of device trials met their primary end points; this rate did not significantly change over time. In conclusion, this descriptive study of the contemporary cardiovascular device clinical trials highlights recent trends toward larger, more international trial programs. These aggregate data may help inform future cardiovascular device development.
AB - Device uptake and development have progressed over the last decade, but few quantitative data exist examining the overall operating characteristics and temporal trends of these clinical trials. We performed a systematic analysis of all cardiovascular device clinical trials from 2001 to 2012 published in medical and cardiovascular journals with the 8 highest impact factors. Of the 1,224 identified cardiovascular clinical trials, 299 (24.4%) focused specifically on devices. Each trial included a median of 335 patients (162 to 745) recruited from a median of 14 sites (3 to 38) over a median enrollment duration of 1.9 years (1.2 to 3.3). Median enrollment rate was 1.1 patients/site/month (0.5 to 4.2). Most device trials targeted coronary artery disease (55.2%), followed by arrhythmias (17.4%). Most were industry sponsored (53.6%) and included mortality as a primary end point (69.6%). The median number of patients (225 to 499, p <0.001 for trend) and enrolling sites (11 to 19, p = 0.07 for trend) increased from 2001 to 2012. During the study period, multinational enrollment grew and approached 50% (p = 0.03), whereas trials enrolling in North America exclusively decreased from 30% to 17% (p = 0.10 for trend). Approximately 70% of device trials met their primary end points; this rate did not significantly change over time. In conclusion, this descriptive study of the contemporary cardiovascular device clinical trials highlights recent trends toward larger, more international trial programs. These aggregate data may help inform future cardiovascular device development.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84931574029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84931574029&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.062
DO - 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.062
M3 - Article
C2 - 25963222
AN - SCOPUS:84931574029
SN - 0002-9149
VL - 116
SP - 307
EP - 312
JO - American Journal of Cardiology
JF - American Journal of Cardiology
IS - 2
M1 - 21122
ER -