Contemporary Incidence and Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Lymph Node Metastases

Adrien N. Bernstein, Jonathan E. Shoag, Ron Golan, Joshua Alexander Halpern, Edward Matthew Schaeffer, Wei Chun Hsu, Paul L. Nguyen, Art Sedrakyan, Ronald C. Chen, Scott E. Eggener, Jim C. Hu*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: The incidence of localized prostate cancer has decreased with shifts in prostate cancer screening. While recent population based studies demonstrated a stable incidence of locoregional prostate cancer, they categorized organ confined, extraprostatic and lymph node positive disease together. However, to our knowledge the contemporary incidence of prostate cancer with pelvic lymph node metastases remains unknown. Materials and Methods: We used SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results) data from 2004 to 2014 to identify men diagnosed with prostate cancer. We analyzed trends in the age standardized prostate cancer incidence by stage. The impact of disease extent on mortality was assessed by adjusted Cox proportional hazard analysis. Results: During the study period the annual incidence of nonmetastatic prostate cancer decreased from 5,119.1 to 2,931.9 per million men (IR 0.57, 95% CI 0.56–0.58, p <0.01) while the incidence of pelvic lymph node metastases increased from 54.1 to 79.5 per million men (IR 1.47, 95% CI 1.33–1.62, p <0.01). The incidence of distant metastases in men 75 years old or older reached a nadir in 2011 compared to 2004 (IR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74–0.90, p <0.01) and it increased in 2012 compared to 2011 (IR 1.13, 95% CI 1.02–1.24, p <0.05). The risk of cancer specific mortality significantly increased in men diagnosed with pelvic lymph node metastases (HR 4.5, 95% CI 4.2–4.9, p <0.01) and distant metastases (HR 21.9, 95% CI 21.2–22.7, p <0.01) compared to men with nonmetastatic disease. Conclusions: The incidence of pelvic lymph node metastases is increasing coincident with a decline in the detection of localized disease. Whether this portends an increase in the burden of advanced disease or simply reflects decreased lead time remains unclear. However, this should be monitored closely as the increase in N1 disease reflects an increase in incurable prostate cancer at diagnosis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1510-1517
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume199
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2018

Keywords

  • SEER Program
  • mortality
  • neoplasm metastasis
  • practice guidelines as topic
  • prostatic neoplasms

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Contemporary Incidence and Outcomes of Prostate Cancer Lymph Node Metastases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this