Contested mergers and equilibrium antitrust policy

David Besanko*, Daniel F. Spulber

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

72 Scopus citations


Although the Guidelines should improve the predictability of the Agency's merger enforcement policy, it is not possible to remove the exercise of judgement from the evaluation of mergers under the antitrust laws. Because the specific standards set forth in the Guidelines must be applied to a broad range of possible factural circumstances, mechanical application of those standards may provide misleading answers to the economic questions raised under the antitrust laws. Moreover, information is often incomplete and the picture of competitive conditions that develops from historical evidence may provide an incomplete answer to the forward-looking inquiry of the Guidelines. Therefore, the Agency will apply the standards of the Guidelines reasonably and flexibly to the particular facts and circumstances of each proposed mermer-1992 Merger Guidelines.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1-29
Number of pages29
JournalJournal of Law, Economics, and Organization
Issue number1
StatePublished - Apr 1993

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Law


Dive into the research topics of 'Contested mergers and equilibrium antitrust policy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this