TY - JOUR
T1 - Contextual trustworthiness of organizational partners
T2 - Evidence from nine school networks
AU - Keppler, Samantha M.
AU - Smilowitz, Karen R.
AU - Leonardi, Paul M.
N1 - Funding Information:
History: This paper has been accepted for the Manufacturing and Service Operations Management Special Issue on People-Centric Operations. Funding: This work was supported by the National Science Foundation [Award 1344266]. Supplemental Material: The supplemental appendix is available at https://doi.org/10.1287/msom. 2020.0892.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 INFORMS.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Problem definition: Trustworthy partners in procurement and service relationships are an asset. How can organizations discern trustworthy from untrustworthy partners, especially early on, so as to not waste time or resources on bad relationships? Academic/practical relevance: Like prior studies, we take the perspective that organizations rarely know whether a partner is trustworthy, but also that organizations often have some evidence of a partner's trustworthiness, even before interacting. We argue a qualitative study is needed to understand how people discern a partner's trustworthiness and the consequences of initial perceptions on the relationship trajectory. Methodology: We conduct an interview-based study of how people discern trustworthy partners in a setting where doing so is challenging: the education sector. Kindergarten-through-12th-grade schools must choose outside partners to rely on for resources or services the school cannot afford. Potential partners are numerous and of variable trustworthiness. Results: We find people use contextual factors as evidence of a potential partner's trustworthiness, such as the partner's institutional affiliations, physical proximity, and relationships with other schools. Sometimes the evidence indicates that a partner acts intrinsically trustworthily, regardless of these contextual factors. In other cases, the evidence indicates a partner acts contextually trustworthily, meaning partners follow through in some conditions but not others. Intrinsically trustworthy partners provide valuable but standardized resources or services. Contextually trustworthy partners provide the competitive advantage: customized resources that are not easily accessible by other schools. Managerial implications: People in organizations identify trustworthy partners via contextual factors, which helps them determine whether a partner acts trustworthily independent of context or conditional on context. The value of intrinsically trustworthy partners derives from their low risk and high quality, whereas the value of contextually trustworthy partners derives from their willingness to customize resources or services to some - but not all - organizations.
AB - Problem definition: Trustworthy partners in procurement and service relationships are an asset. How can organizations discern trustworthy from untrustworthy partners, especially early on, so as to not waste time or resources on bad relationships? Academic/practical relevance: Like prior studies, we take the perspective that organizations rarely know whether a partner is trustworthy, but also that organizations often have some evidence of a partner's trustworthiness, even before interacting. We argue a qualitative study is needed to understand how people discern a partner's trustworthiness and the consequences of initial perceptions on the relationship trajectory. Methodology: We conduct an interview-based study of how people discern trustworthy partners in a setting where doing so is challenging: the education sector. Kindergarten-through-12th-grade schools must choose outside partners to rely on for resources or services the school cannot afford. Potential partners are numerous and of variable trustworthiness. Results: We find people use contextual factors as evidence of a potential partner's trustworthiness, such as the partner's institutional affiliations, physical proximity, and relationships with other schools. Sometimes the evidence indicates that a partner acts intrinsically trustworthily, regardless of these contextual factors. In other cases, the evidence indicates a partner acts contextually trustworthily, meaning partners follow through in some conditions but not others. Intrinsically trustworthy partners provide valuable but standardized resources or services. Contextually trustworthy partners provide the competitive advantage: customized resources that are not easily accessible by other schools. Managerial implications: People in organizations identify trustworthy partners via contextual factors, which helps them determine whether a partner acts trustworthily independent of context or conditional on context. The value of intrinsically trustworthy partners derives from their low risk and high quality, whereas the value of contextually trustworthy partners derives from their willingness to customize resources or services to some - but not all - organizations.
KW - Behavioral operations
KW - Nonprofit management
KW - OM-organizational behavior interface
KW - Service operations
KW - Supply chain management
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85113944522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85113944522&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1287/MSOM.2020.0892
DO - 10.1287/MSOM.2020.0892
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85113944522
SN - 1523-4614
VL - 23
SP - 974
EP - 988
JO - Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
JF - Manufacturing and Service Operations Management
IS - 4
ER -