Contour integration in peripheral vision reduces gradually with eccentricity

Alex K. Nugent, Rajesh N. Keswani, Russell L. Woods*, Eli Peli

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Hess and Dakin [Nature 390 (1997) 602; Vision Res. 39 (1999) 947] reported that normally-sighted subjects using peripheral vision (beyond 10°) were unable to detect paths of alternating-phase Gabors embedded within randomly positioned Gabors, but could detect same-phase paths. This result led them to propose a "fundamental difference" between central and peripheral visual processing. While we were able to replicate many of their results, our normally-sighted observers could detect alternating-phase paths beyond 10°. We found that path detection decreased monotonically as a function of eccentricity (0°-30°) for both alternating-phase and same-phase stimuli. As with most visual functions the more difficult path detection condition (alternating-phase) declined slightly faster. The results for the normally-sighted observers could not be explained by poor fixation. Three people with substantial central vision loss (i.e. they can only use peripheral vision) could see both same- and alternating-phase stimuli with eccentric viewing of 13°-17°. Therefore central and peripheral vision appear to use similar visual mechanisms to perform the task, there being no fundamental difference.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)2427-2437
Number of pages11
JournalVision Research
Volume43
Issue number23
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2003

Keywords

  • Central-field loss
  • Contour integration
  • Neural adaptation
  • Periphery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ophthalmology
  • Sensory Systems

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Contour integration in peripheral vision reduces gradually with eccentricity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this