TY - GEN
T1 - Contributions of joint mechanics and neural control to the generation of torque during movement
AU - Ludvig, Daniel
AU - Whitmore, Mariah W.
AU - Perreault, Eric J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 IEEE.
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - Completing motor tasks that require contact is dependent on an ability to regulate the relationship between limb motions and interaction forces with the environment. This can be achieved by exploiting the mechanical properties of a limb or through active regulation of joint torques through changes in muscle activation. Leveraging the mechanical properties of a joint might simplify neural control when they are matched to the functional requirements of a task. The purpose of this study was to determine if humans change their control strategy, relying on limb mechanics rather than regulated muscle activation, when feasible. This was accomplished by measuring ankle impedance and muscle activation strategies in three tasks requiring joint torques to: oppose movement, assist movement, or remain constant during movement. We found that subjects produced more torque due to impedance and less torque due to muscle activation in the torque-oppose task, the only task that could feasibly be completed through impedance modulation. These results demonstrate that people do leverage the mechanical properties of a joint to complete certain task, lessening the need for precisely timed muscle contractions.
AB - Completing motor tasks that require contact is dependent on an ability to regulate the relationship between limb motions and interaction forces with the environment. This can be achieved by exploiting the mechanical properties of a limb or through active regulation of joint torques through changes in muscle activation. Leveraging the mechanical properties of a joint might simplify neural control when they are matched to the functional requirements of a task. The purpose of this study was to determine if humans change their control strategy, relying on limb mechanics rather than regulated muscle activation, when feasible. This was accomplished by measuring ankle impedance and muscle activation strategies in three tasks requiring joint torques to: oppose movement, assist movement, or remain constant during movement. We found that subjects produced more torque due to impedance and less torque due to muscle activation in the torque-oppose task, the only task that could feasibly be completed through impedance modulation. These results demonstrate that people do leverage the mechanical properties of a joint to complete certain task, lessening the need for precisely timed muscle contractions.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85091034292&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85091034292&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175898
DO - 10.1109/EMBC44109.2020.9175898
M3 - Conference contribution
C2 - 33018830
AN - SCOPUS:85091034292
T3 - Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBS
SP - 3807
EP - 3810
BT - 42nd Annual International Conferences of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 42nd Annual International Conferences of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, EMBC 2020
Y2 - 20 July 2020 through 24 July 2020
ER -