Controversy over contraception coverage - Reply

Dana R. Gossett; Jessica Kiley; Cassing Hammond

doi:10.1001/jama.2013.276773

Controversy over contraception coverage - Reply

Dana R. Gossett^*, Jessica Kiley, Cassing Hammond

^*Corresponding author for this work

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1288-1289
Number of pages	2
Journal	JAMA
Volume	310
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.276773
State	Published - Sep 25 2013

ASJC Scopus subject areas

General Medicine

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1001/jama.2013.276773

Cite this

@article{657ee364234e47d7ad2eeab44233b6fc,

title = "Controversy over contraception coverage - Reply",

author = "Gossett, {Dana R.} and Jessica Kiley and Cassing Hammond",

year = "2013",

month = sep,

day = "25",

doi = "10.1001/jama.2013.276773",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "310",

pages = "1288--1289",

journal = "JAMA",

issn = "0098-7484",

publisher = "American Medical Association",

number = "12",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Controversy over contraception coverage - Reply

AU - Gossett, Dana R.

AU - Kiley, Jessica

AU - Hammond, Cassing

PY - 2013/9/25

Y1 - 2013/9/25

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84884610563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84884610563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1001/jama.2013.276773

DO - 10.1001/jama.2013.276773

M3 - Letter

C2 - 24065021

AN - SCOPUS:84884610563

SN - 0098-7484

VL - 310

SP - 1288

EP - 1289

JO - JAMA

JF - JAMA

IS - 12

ER -

Controversy over contraception coverage - Reply

ASJC Scopus subject areas

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Cite this