Convention, form, and figurative language processing

Dedre Gentner, Brian F Bowdle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review


There are 2 basic controversies concerning how metaphors are processed. First, are metaphoric mappings more akin to literal comparisons or to literal categorizations? And second, is metaphor comprehension indirect or direct? We believe that these controversies are more apparent than real and that a unified theoretical framework can be offered that reconciles these opposing views. The central idea is that all metaphors involve structural alignment of the target and base domains. Whether these alignments are more akin to comparisons or to categorizations, and whether they are computed directly or indirectly, depends on 2 factors: the type of representation invoked by the base term and the linguistic form of the metaphor.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)223-247
JournalMeatphor and Symbol
StatePublished - 2001


Dive into the research topics of 'Convention, form, and figurative language processing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this