TY - JOUR
T1 - Coordination and management of multisite complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) therapies
T2 - Experience from a multisite reflexology intervention trial
AU - Rahbar, Mohammad H.
AU - Wyatt, Gwen
AU - Sikorskii, Alla
AU - Victorson, David
AU - Ardjomand-Hessabi, Manouchehr
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute [ R01 CA104883 ]. We also acknowledge the support provided by the Biostatistics/Epidemiology/Research Design (BERD) component of the Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences (CCTS) for this project. CCTS is mainly funded by NIH CTSA grant ( UL1 RR024148 ), awarded to the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston in 2006.
PY - 2011/9
Y1 - 2011/9
N2 - Background: Multisite randomized clinical trials allow for increased research collaboration among investigators and expedite data collection efforts. As a result, government funding agencies typically look favorably upon this approach. As the field of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) continues to evolve, so do increased calls for the use of more rigorous study design and trial methodologies, which can present challenges for investigators. Purpose: To describe the processes involved in the coordination and management of a multisite randomized clinical trial of a CAM intervention. Methods: Key aspects related to the coordination and management of a multisite CAM randomized clinical trial are presented, including organizational and site selection considerations, recruitment concerns and issues related to data collection and randomization to treatment groups. Management and monitoring of data, as well as quality assurance procedures are described. Finally, a real world perspective is shared from a recently conducted multisite randomized clinical trial of reflexology for women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer. Results: The use of multiple sites in the conduct of CAM-based randomized clinical trials can provide an efficient, collaborative and robust approach to study coordination and data collection that maximizes efficiency and ensures the quality of results. Conclusions: Multisite randomized clinical trial designs can offer the field of CAM research a more standardized and efficient approach to examine the effectiveness of novel therapies and treatments. Special attention must be given to intervention fidelity, consistent data collection and ensuring data quality. Assessment and reporting of quantitative indicators of data quality should be required.
AB - Background: Multisite randomized clinical trials allow for increased research collaboration among investigators and expedite data collection efforts. As a result, government funding agencies typically look favorably upon this approach. As the field of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) continues to evolve, so do increased calls for the use of more rigorous study design and trial methodologies, which can present challenges for investigators. Purpose: To describe the processes involved in the coordination and management of a multisite randomized clinical trial of a CAM intervention. Methods: Key aspects related to the coordination and management of a multisite CAM randomized clinical trial are presented, including organizational and site selection considerations, recruitment concerns and issues related to data collection and randomization to treatment groups. Management and monitoring of data, as well as quality assurance procedures are described. Finally, a real world perspective is shared from a recently conducted multisite randomized clinical trial of reflexology for women diagnosed with advanced breast cancer. Results: The use of multiple sites in the conduct of CAM-based randomized clinical trials can provide an efficient, collaborative and robust approach to study coordination and data collection that maximizes efficiency and ensures the quality of results. Conclusions: Multisite randomized clinical trial designs can offer the field of CAM research a more standardized and efficient approach to examine the effectiveness of novel therapies and treatments. Special attention must be given to intervention fidelity, consistent data collection and ensuring data quality. Assessment and reporting of quantitative indicators of data quality should be required.
KW - CONSORT
KW - Complementary and alternative medicine
KW - Data coordination and management
KW - Multisite randomized clinical trials
KW - Quality assurance
KW - Reflexology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960891306&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960891306&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cct.2011.05.015
DO - 10.1016/j.cct.2011.05.015
M3 - Article
C2 - 21664296
AN - SCOPUS:79960891306
SN - 1551-7144
VL - 32
SP - 620
EP - 629
JO - Contemporary Clinical Trials
JF - Contemporary Clinical Trials
IS - 5
ER -