TY - JOUR
T1 - Coping as a Multifaceted Construct
T2 - Associations with Psychological Outcomes among Family Members of Mechanical Ventilation Survivors
AU - Nadig, Nandita
AU - Huff, Nidhi G.
AU - Cox, Christopher E.
AU - Ford, Dee W.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 by the Society of Critical Care Medicine and Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PY - 2016/9/1
Y1 - 2016/9/1
N2 - Objectives: To develop and evaluate a preliminary multifaceted model for coping among family members of patients who survive mechanical ventilation. Design and Setting: In this multicenter cross-sectional survey, we interviewed family members of mechanically ventilated patients at the time of transfer from the ICU to the hospital ward. We constructed a theoretic model of coping that included characteristics attributable to family members, family-clinician rapport, and patients. We then explored relationships between coping factors and symptoms of psychological distress (anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress). Subjects: Fifty-six family members of survivors of mechanical ventilation. Measurements and Main Results: Psychological distress measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Posttraumatic Stress Scale. Optimism measured using the Life Orientation Test scale, resiliency by Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale, and social support using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System inventory. Family members had moderate levels of psychological distress with median total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale equal to 14 (interquartile range, 5-20) and Posttraumatic Stress Scale equal to 22 (interquartile range, 15-31). Among family member characteristics, greater optimism (p = 0.001, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; p = 0.010, Posttraumatic Stress Scale), resilience (p = 0.012, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and social support (p = 0.013, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were protective against psychological distress. On the contrary, characteristics of family-clinician rapport such as communication quality and presence of conflict did not have any associations with psychological distress. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore coping as a multifaceted construct and its relationship with family psychological outcomes among survivors of mechanical ventilation. We found certain family characteristics of coping such as optimism, resilience, and social support to be associated with less psychological distress. Further research is warranted to identify potentially modifiable aspects of coping that might guide future interventions.
AB - Objectives: To develop and evaluate a preliminary multifaceted model for coping among family members of patients who survive mechanical ventilation. Design and Setting: In this multicenter cross-sectional survey, we interviewed family members of mechanically ventilated patients at the time of transfer from the ICU to the hospital ward. We constructed a theoretic model of coping that included characteristics attributable to family members, family-clinician rapport, and patients. We then explored relationships between coping factors and symptoms of psychological distress (anxiety, depression, and posttraumatic stress). Subjects: Fifty-six family members of survivors of mechanical ventilation. Measurements and Main Results: Psychological distress measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Posttraumatic Stress Scale. Optimism measured using the Life Orientation Test scale, resiliency by Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale, and social support using the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System inventory. Family members had moderate levels of psychological distress with median total Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale equal to 14 (interquartile range, 5-20) and Posttraumatic Stress Scale equal to 22 (interquartile range, 15-31). Among family member characteristics, greater optimism (p = 0.001, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; p = 0.010, Posttraumatic Stress Scale), resilience (p = 0.012, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and social support (p = 0.013, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale) were protective against psychological distress. On the contrary, characteristics of family-clinician rapport such as communication quality and presence of conflict did not have any associations with psychological distress. Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first study to explore coping as a multifaceted construct and its relationship with family psychological outcomes among survivors of mechanical ventilation. We found certain family characteristics of coping such as optimism, resilience, and social support to be associated with less psychological distress. Further research is warranted to identify potentially modifiable aspects of coping that might guide future interventions.
KW - coping
KW - critical illness
KW - family member of intensive care unit patients
KW - intensive care unit
KW - optimism
KW - psychological distress
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84963664673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84963664673&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001761
DO - 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001761
M3 - Article
C2 - 27065467
AN - SCOPUS:84963664673
SN - 0090-3493
VL - 44
SP - 1710
EP - 1717
JO - Critical care medicine
JF - Critical care medicine
IS - 9
ER -