Correction: Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing (Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, (2023), 26, 4, (499-503), 10.1007/s11019-023-10176-6)

Gregory E. Kaebnick*, David Christopher Magnus, Audiey Kao, Mohammad Hosseini, David Resnik, Veljko Dubljević, Christy Rentmeester, Bert Gordijn, Mark J. Cherry

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

In the original publication of the article, under the section “Toward shared norms” the following sentence “However, to our knowledge, previous position statements have not addressed the responsibilities of reviewers to authors (Zielinski et al. 2023)” was published incorrectly. The correct sentence should read as follows “Previous position statements have addressed concerns about the use of AI for peer review and the importance of reviewers revealing to authors if they used AI in their review (Zielinski et al. 2023). However, to our knowledge, none have addressed the importance of using human reviewers to review manuscripts and editors retaining final decisions over what reviewers to select.”.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)505
Number of pages1
JournalMedicine, Health Care and Philosophy
Volume26
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health(social science)
  • Education
  • Philosophy
  • Health Policy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction: Editors’ statement on the responsible use of generative AI technologies in scholarly journal publishing (Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, (2023), 26, 4, (499-503), 10.1007/s11019-023-10176-6)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this