Correction to: A common longitudinal intensive care unit data format (CLIF) for critical illness research (Intensive Care Medicine, (2025), 51, 3, (556-569), 10.1007/s00134-025-07848-7)

Juan C. Rojas, Patrick G. Lyons, Kaveri Chhikara, Vaishvik Chaudhari, Sivasubramanium V. Bhavani, Muna Nour, Kevin G. Buell, Kevin D. Smith, Catherine A. Gao, Saki Amagai, Chengsheng Mao, Yuan Luo, Anna K. Barker, Mark Nuppnau, Michael Hermsen, Jay L. Koyner, Haley Beck, Rachel Baccile, Zewei Liao, Kyle A. CareyBrenna Park-Egan, Xuan Han, Alexander C. Ortiz, Benjamin E. Schmid, Gary E. Weissman, Chad H. Hochberg, Nicholas E. Ingraham, William F. Parker*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

After this article had been published, a data error in Table 2 was noticed that led to another error in the Abstract and CLIF consortium demographics section. Instead of “We converted longitudinal data from 111,440 critically ill patient admissions from 2020 to 2021 (mean age 60.7 years [standard deviation 17.1], 31% Black, 6% Hispanic, 44% female) across 9 health systems and 38 hospitals into CLIF databases" “To date, we have established CLIF databases at nine US health systems, comprising 38 unique hospitals and 111,440 ICU admissions.” the respective part of the Abstract should read: “We converted longitudinal data from 111,440 critically ill patient admissions from 2020 to 2021 (mean age 60.7 years [standard deviation 17.1], 28% Black, 7% Hispanic, 44% female) across 9 health systems and 39 hospitals into CLIF databases.” the respective part of the CLIF consortium demographics section should read: “To date, we have established CLIF databases at nine US health systems, comprising 39 unique hospitals and 111,440 ICU admissions.” The correct version of Table 2 is given here. (Table presented.) Characteristics and outcomes of ICU patient encounters in 2020–2021 across CLIF sites Characteristic Emory University Johns Hopkins Health System Northwestern University Oregon Health & Science University Rush University University of Chicago University of Michigan University of Minnesota University of Pennsylvania CLIF Consortium (Combined) Hospitalizations with an ICU stay, n 15,124 18,242 17,150 8559 9853 8053 7301 13,130 14,028 111,440 Hospitals, n 4 5 8 2 1 1 1 11 6 39 Age (years), mean (SD) 61.3 (16.4) 60.8 (17.4) 63.1 (17.1) 60.3 (17.4) 59.6 (16.9) 56.4 (18.5) 58.9 (16.2) 61.7 (17.3) 60.3 (16.9) 60.7 (17.1) Female n (%) 7100 (46.9%) 8315 (45.6%) 7425 (43.3%) 3517 (41.1%) 4660 (47.3%) 3411 (42.4%) 3011 (41.2%) 5726 (43.6%) 6193 (44.1%) 49,358 (44.3%) Race n (%) Asian 521 (3.4%) 790 (4.3%) 593 (3.5%) 258 (3.0%) 327 (3.3%) 148 (1.8%) 143 (2.0%) 847 (6.5%) 435 (3.1%) 4062 (3.6%) Black 6707 (44.3%) 5643 (30.9%) 2199 (12.8%) 214 (2.5%) 3995 (40.5%) 5290 (65.7%) 879 (12.0%) 896 (6.8%) 5240 (37.4%) 31,063 (27.9%) White 6953 (46.0%) 10,255 (56.2%) 12,723 (74.2%) 6960 (81.3%) 3697 (37.5%) 2015 (25.0%) 5780 (79.2%) 10,790 (82.2%) 7158 (51.0%) 66,331 (59.5%) Others 943 (6.2%) 1554 (8.5%) 1635 (9.5%) 1127 (13.2%) 1834 (18.6%) 600 (7.5%) 499 (6.8%) 597 (4.5%) 1195 (8.5%) 9984 (8.9%) Ethnicity n (%) Hispanic or Latino 577 (3.8%) 1088 (6.0%) 1753 (10.2%) 657 (7.7%) 1968 (20.0%) 514 (6.4%) 210 (2.9%) 249 (1.9%) 495 (3.5%) 7511 (6.7%) Hospital mortality, n (%) 1307 (8.6%) 1905 (10.4%) 1502 (8.8%) 677 (7.9%) 729 (7.4%) 1004 (12.5%) 847 (11.6%) 1032 (7.9%) 1718 (12.2%) 10,721 (9.6%) Mechanical ventilation, N, (%) 6031 (39.9%) 6804 (37.3%) 5080 (29.6%) 3231 (37.7%) 2859 (29.0%) 3462 (43.0%) 4007 (54.9%) 4801 (36.6%) 6167 (44.0%) 42,442 (39.1%) FiO2 Median [IQR] 0.4 [0.4, 0.6] 0.4 [0.4, 0.6] 0.4 [0.4, 0.6] 0.35 [0.28, 0.5] 0.4 [0.35, 0.7] 0.4 [0.4, 0.6] 0.4 [0.4, 0.6] 0.4 [0.35, 0.6] 0.4 [0.4, 0.6] 0.4 [0.37, 0.60] Peep Median [IQR] 6.0 [6.0, 10.0] 5.0 [5.0, 8.0] 5.0 [5.0, 7.0] 5.0 [5.0, 8.0] 8.0 [8.0, 8.0] 5.0 [5.0, 5.0] 5.0 [5.0, 10.0] 5.0 [5.0, 8.0] 5.1 [5.0, 8.0] 5.0 [5.4, 8.03] Initial mode category, n (%) Assist control-volume control 2501 (41.57%) 3942 (57.95%) 4284 (84.33%) 2623 (81.18%) 337 (11.79%) 2810 (81.17%) 1097 (27.38%) 4453 (92.77%) 3664 (59.41%) 25,711 (60.58%) Pressure-regulated volume control 1004 (16.65%) 1335 (19.62%) 174 (3.43%) 60 (1.86%) 1740 (60.86%) 0 (0%) 2416 (60.29%) 52 (1.08%) 2 (0.03%) 6783 (15.98%) Pressure control 124 (2.06%) 106 (1.56%) 151 (2.97%) 89 (2.75%) 280 (9.79%) 80 (2.31%) 225 (5.62%) 73 (1.52%) 60 (0.97%) 1188 (2.80%) Pressure support/CPAP 466 (7.73%) 277 (4.07%) 161 (3.17%) 260 (8.05%) 402 (14.06%) 419 (12.1%) 37 (0.92%) 91 (1.9%) 944 (15.31%) 3057 (7.20%) SIMV 668 (11.08%) 1086 (15.96%) 196 (3.86%) 0 (0%) 25 (0.87%) 52 (1.5%) 0 (0%) 61 (1.27%) 1398 (22.67%) 3486 (8.21%) Other 31 (0.51%) 57 (0.84%) 5 (0.1%) 185 (5.73%) 8 (0.28%) 31 (0.9%) 212 (5.29%) 23 (0.48%) 29 (0.47%) 581 (1.37%) No mode documented 1237 (20.51%) 1 (0.0%) 109 (2.15%) 14 (0.43%) 67 (2.34%) 70 (2.02%) 20 (0.5%) 48 (0.98%) 70 (1.14%) 1636 (3.85%) CLIF Common Longitudinal ICU data Format, SD standard deviation The Original Article has been corrected.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)836-839
Number of pages4
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
Volume51
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: A common longitudinal intensive care unit data format (CLIF) for critical illness research (Intensive Care Medicine, (2025), 51, 3, (556-569), 10.1007/s00134-025-07848-7)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this