Correction to: The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean (Journal of Perinatology, (2019), 39, 10, (1340-1348), 10.1038/s41372-019-0399-5)

Anjali J. Kaimal*, William A. Grobman, Allison Bryant, Cinthia Blat, Peter Bacchetti, Juan Gonzalez, Mari Paule Thiet, Yamilee Bermingham, Miriam Kuppermann

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debatepeer-review

Abstract

Since publication of this Article, the authors noted an error in the first paragraph of the results. The correct text is provided below: Two hundred and ninety-eligible women were approached for participation; 249 participants enrolled (85.8%). All participants completed the interview and had chart review information regarding clinical history, demographics, and outcomes available. Fifteen participants were noted to have a contraindication to TOLAC at the time of chart review (persistent breech presentation or placenta previa at the time of delivery) and three women were excluded as information regarding delivery approach (TOLAC or ERCD) was not available, leaving data from 231 participants for analysis.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1696
Number of pages1
JournalJournal of Perinatology
Volume39
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Correction to: The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean (Journal of Perinatology, (2019), 39, 10, (1340-1348), 10.1038/s41372-019-0399-5)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this