Correction to: The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean (Journal of Perinatology, (2019), 39, 10, (1340-1348), 10.1038/s41372-019-0399-5)

Anjali J. Kaimal; William A. Grobman; Allison Bryant; Cinthia Blat; Peter Bacchetti; Juan Gonzalez; Mari Paule Thiet; Yamilee Bermingham; Miriam Kuppermann

doi:10.1038/s41372-019-0522-7

Correction to: The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean (Journal of Perinatology, (2019), 39, 10, (1340-1348), 10.1038/s41372-019-0399-5)

Anjali J. Kaimal^*, William A. Grobman, Allison Bryant, Cinthia Blat, Peter Bacchetti, Juan Gonzalez, Mari Paule Thiet, Yamilee Bermingham, Miriam Kuppermann

^*Corresponding author for this work

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

Since publication of this Article, the authors noted an error in the first paragraph of the results. The correct text is provided below: Two hundred and ninety-eligible women were approached for participation; 249 participants enrolled (85.8%). All participants completed the interview and had chart review information regarding clinical history, demographics, and outcomes available. Fifteen participants were noted to have a contraindication to TOLAC at the time of chart review (persistent breech presentation or placenta previa at the time of delivery) and three women were excluded as information regarding delivery approach (TOLAC or ERCD) was not available, leaving data from 231 participants for analysis.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	1696
Number of pages	1
Journal	Journal of Perinatology
Volume	39
Issue number	12
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0522-7
State	Published - Dec 1 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Pediatrics, Perinatology, and Child Health
Obstetrics and Gynecology

Access to Document

10.1038/s41372-019-0522-7

Cite this

Kaimal, A. J., Grobman, W. A., Bryant, A., Blat, C., Bacchetti, P., Gonzalez, J., Thiet, M. P., Bermingham, Y., & Kuppermann, M. (2019). Correction to: The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean (Journal of Perinatology, (2019), 39, 10, (1340-1348), 10.1038/s41372-019-0399-5). Journal of Perinatology, 39(12), 1696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0522-7

@article{3f69f93073ae4c88af56e862c6f7ca28,

title = "Correction to: The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean (Journal of Perinatology, (2019), 39, 10, (1340-1348), 10.1038/s41372-019-0399-5)",

abstract = "Since publication of this Article, the authors noted an error in the first paragraph of the results. The correct text is provided below: Two hundred and ninety-eligible women were approached for participation; 249 participants enrolled (85.8%). All participants completed the interview and had chart review information regarding clinical history, demographics, and outcomes available. Fifteen participants were noted to have a contraindication to TOLAC at the time of chart review (persistent breech presentation or placenta previa at the time of delivery) and three women were excluded as information regarding delivery approach (TOLAC or ERCD) was not available, leaving data from 231 participants for analysis.",

author = "Kaimal, {Anjali J.} and Grobman, {William A.} and Allison Bryant and Cinthia Blat and Peter Bacchetti and Juan Gonzalez and Thiet, {Mari Paule} and Yamilee Bermingham and Miriam Kuppermann",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019, Springer Nature America, Inc.",

year = "2019",

month = dec,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1038/s41372-019-0522-7",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "39",

pages = "1696",

journal = "Journal of Perinatology",

issn = "0743-8346",

publisher = "Nature Publishing Group",

number = "12",

}

Kaimal, AJ, Grobman, WA, Bryant, A, Blat, C, Bacchetti, P, Gonzalez, J, Thiet, MP, Bermingham, Y & Kuppermann, M 2019, 'Correction to: The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean (Journal of Perinatology, (2019), 39, 10, (1340-1348), 10.1038/s41372-019-0399-5)', Journal of Perinatology, vol. 39, no. 12, pp. 1696. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41372-019-0522-7

Correction to: The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean (Journal of Perinatology, (2019), 39, 10, (1340-1348), 10.1038/s41372-019-0399-5). / Kaimal, Anjali J.; Grobman, William A.; Bryant, Allison et al.
In: Journal of Perinatology, Vol. 39, No. 12, 01.12.2019, p. 1696.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Correction to

T2 - The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean (Journal of Perinatology, (2019), 39, 10, (1340-1348), 10.1038/s41372-019-0399-5)

AU - Kaimal, Anjali J.

AU - Grobman, William A.

AU - Bryant, Allison

AU - Blat, Cinthia

AU - Bacchetti, Peter

AU - Gonzalez, Juan

AU - Thiet, Mari Paule

AU - Bermingham, Yamilee

AU - Kuppermann, Miriam

PY - 2019/12/1

Y1 - 2019/12/1

N2 - Since publication of this Article, the authors noted an error in the first paragraph of the results. The correct text is provided below: Two hundred and ninety-eligible women were approached for participation; 249 participants enrolled (85.8%). All participants completed the interview and had chart review information regarding clinical history, demographics, and outcomes available. Fifteen participants were noted to have a contraindication to TOLAC at the time of chart review (persistent breech presentation or placenta previa at the time of delivery) and three women were excluded as information regarding delivery approach (TOLAC or ERCD) was not available, leaving data from 231 participants for analysis.

AB - Since publication of this Article, the authors noted an error in the first paragraph of the results. The correct text is provided below: Two hundred and ninety-eligible women were approached for participation; 249 participants enrolled (85.8%). All participants completed the interview and had chart review information regarding clinical history, demographics, and outcomes available. Fifteen participants were noted to have a contraindication to TOLAC at the time of chart review (persistent breech presentation or placenta previa at the time of delivery) and three women were excluded as information regarding delivery approach (TOLAC or ERCD) was not available, leaving data from 231 participants for analysis.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074524010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074524010&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41372-019-0522-7

DO - 10.1038/s41372-019-0522-7

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 31601948

AN - SCOPUS:85074524010

SN - 0743-8346

VL - 39

SP - 1696

JO - Journal of Perinatology

JF - Journal of Perinatology

IS - 12

ER -

Correction to: The association of patient preferences and attitudes with trial of labor after cesarean (Journal of Perinatology, (2019), 39, 10, (1340-1348), 10.1038/s41372-019-0399-5)

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this