Correlates of honor ratings in a clinical clerkship employing a faculty forum evaluation system

Debra A. Darosa*, Roland Folse, John F. Markus

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine whether or not suspected variables affected a surgery clerk's chances of being awarded an honor rating. Findings indicated a significant relationship between a student receiving an honor rating and his or her preceptor's predetermined level of student advocacy, the number of completed patient interview and physical examination write-ups, and final examination scores. There was no significant relationship found between honor ratings and the preceptor's status, the sequence in which the student was discussed or the length of time spent discussing the student at the final evaluation meeting, or the number of clinical faculty present at the meeting. These results lend support to the faculty forum evaluation approach, but suggest a need for further scrutiny of some influencing variables to ensure all students are fairly considered and honor ratings judiciously awarded.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)127-130
Number of pages4
JournalEvaluation and Program Planning
Volume7
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Social Psychology
  • Geography, Planning and Development
  • Strategy and Management
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Correlates of honor ratings in a clinical clerkship employing a faculty forum evaluation system'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this