Corrigendum to “The Priest-Klein hypotheses: Proofs and generality” [Int. Rev. Law Econ. 48 (2016) 59–76, (International Review of Law and Economics (2016) 48(59-76) (S0144818816300291), (10.1016/j.irle.2016.06.002))

Yoon Ho Alex Lee; Daniel Klerman

doi:10.1016/j.irle.2022.106078

Corrigendum to “The Priest-Klein hypotheses: Proofs and generality” [Int. Rev. Law Econ. 48 (2016) 59–76, (International Review of Law and Economics (2016) 48(59-76) (S0144818816300291), (10.1016/j.irle.2016.06.002))

Yoon Ho Alex Lee^*, Daniel Klerman

^*Corresponding author for this work

Pritzker School of Law

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

Abstract

It has come to our attention that some of the graphs in Figs. 1 and 4 were drawn with incorrect scaling. The corrected graphs are included here. None of the proofs are affected, and all mathematical results remain valid. We thank Yiran Ma for pointing out this error. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

Original language	English (US)
Article number	106078
Journal	International Review of Law and Economics
Volume	71
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irle.2022.106078
State	Published - Sep 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Finance
Economics and Econometrics
Law

Access to Document

10.1016/j.irle.2022.106078

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “The Priest-Klein hypotheses: Proofs and generality” [Int. Rev. Law Econ. 48 (2016) 59–76, (International Review of Law and Economics (2016) 48(59-76) (S0144818816300291), (10.1016/j.irle.2016.06.002))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

@article{1dbe71c5b3a64cef8e423adf1767b783,

title = "Corrigendum to “The Priest-Klein hypotheses: Proofs and generality” [Int. Rev. Law Econ. 48 (2016) 59–76, (International Review of Law and Economics (2016) 48(59-76) (S0144818816300291), (10.1016/j.irle.2016.06.002))",

abstract = "It has come to our attention that some of the graphs in Figs. 1 and 4 were drawn with incorrect scaling. The corrected graphs are included here. None of the proofs are affected, and all mathematical results remain valid. We thank Yiran Ma for pointing out this error. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.",

author = "Lee, {Yoon Ho Alex} and Daniel Klerman",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022 Elsevier Inc.",

year = "2022",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.irle.2022.106078",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "71",

journal = "International Review of Law and Economics",

issn = "0144-8188",

publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",

}

Corrigendum to “The Priest-Klein hypotheses: Proofs and generality” [Int. Rev. Law Econ. 48 (2016) 59–76, (International Review of Law and Economics (2016) 48(59-76) (S0144818816300291), (10.1016/j.irle.2016.06.002)). / Lee, Yoon Ho Alex; Klerman, Daniel.
In: International Review of Law and Economics, Vol. 71, 106078, 09.2022.

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corrigendum to “The Priest-Klein hypotheses

T2 - Proofs and generality” [Int. Rev. Law Econ. 48 (2016) 59–76, (International Review of Law and Economics (2016) 48(59-76) (S0144818816300291), (10.1016/j.irle.2016.06.002))

AU - Lee, Yoon Ho Alex

AU - Klerman, Daniel

PY - 2022/9

Y1 - 2022/9

N2 - It has come to our attention that some of the graphs in Figs. 1 and 4 were drawn with incorrect scaling. The corrected graphs are included here. None of the proofs are affected, and all mathematical results remain valid. We thank Yiran Ma for pointing out this error. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

AB - It has come to our attention that some of the graphs in Figs. 1 and 4 were drawn with incorrect scaling. The corrected graphs are included here. None of the proofs are affected, and all mathematical results remain valid. We thank Yiran Ma for pointing out this error. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132895390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132895390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.irle.2022.106078

DO - 10.1016/j.irle.2022.106078

M3 - Comment/debate

AN - SCOPUS:85132895390

SN - 0144-8188

VL - 71

JO - International Review of Law and Economics

JF - International Review of Law and Economics

M1 - 106078

ER -

Corrigendum to “The Priest-Klein hypotheses: Proofs and generality” [Int. Rev. Law Econ. 48 (2016) 59–76, (International Review of Law and Economics (2016) 48(59-76) (S0144818816300291), (10.1016/j.irle.2016.06.002))

Abstract

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this