Corruption in the context of moral trade-offs

James Dungan*, Adam Waytz, Liane Young

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

17 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Moral psychology has begun to characterize the circumstances that lead people to commit moral violations. However, the decision to engage in corrupt behaviour may not always reflect a choice between right and wrong. Rather, the decision may represent a trade-off between competing moral concerns (for example, being fair and impartial to all versus loyal to one's own group). Taking the tension between fairness and loyalty as a case study, we demonstrate that the way people make trade-offs between competing moral norms predicts morally relevant behaviour, such as decisions to blow the whistle on unethical acts. We then suggest that this tension reflects a deeper distinction within our moral psychology, namely, a distinction between group-based norms (for example, loyalty) and norms that apply universally, independent of group membership (for example, fairness). Finally, we discuss what factors may influence the adoption of group-based versus groupindependent norms and therefore, how these factors might deter or promote corruption.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)97-118
Number of pages22
JournalJournal of Interdisciplinary Economics
Volume26
Issue number1-2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Trade-offs
Corruption
Loyalty
Fairness
Psychology
Factors
Influence factors
Violations
Group membership
Moral norms

Keywords

  • Corruption
  • Fairness
  • Hypocrisy
  • Loyalty
  • Whistle-blowing

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics

Cite this

Dungan, James ; Waytz, Adam ; Young, Liane. / Corruption in the context of moral trade-offs. In: Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics. 2014 ; Vol. 26, No. 1-2. pp. 97-118.
@article{f295a02cff1948f29cb208959cd9ac6e,
title = "Corruption in the context of moral trade-offs",
abstract = "Moral psychology has begun to characterize the circumstances that lead people to commit moral violations. However, the decision to engage in corrupt behaviour may not always reflect a choice between right and wrong. Rather, the decision may represent a trade-off between competing moral concerns (for example, being fair and impartial to all versus loyal to one's own group). Taking the tension between fairness and loyalty as a case study, we demonstrate that the way people make trade-offs between competing moral norms predicts morally relevant behaviour, such as decisions to blow the whistle on unethical acts. We then suggest that this tension reflects a deeper distinction within our moral psychology, namely, a distinction between group-based norms (for example, loyalty) and norms that apply universally, independent of group membership (for example, fairness). Finally, we discuss what factors may influence the adoption of group-based versus groupindependent norms and therefore, how these factors might deter or promote corruption.",
keywords = "Corruption, Fairness, Hypocrisy, Loyalty, Whistle-blowing",
author = "James Dungan and Adam Waytz and Liane Young",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0260107914540832",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "26",
pages = "97--118",
journal = "Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics",
issn = "0260-1079",
publisher = "A B Academic Publishers",
number = "1-2",

}

Corruption in the context of moral trade-offs. / Dungan, James; Waytz, Adam; Young, Liane.

In: Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics, Vol. 26, No. 1-2, 01.01.2014, p. 97-118.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

TY - JOUR

T1 - Corruption in the context of moral trade-offs

AU - Dungan, James

AU - Waytz, Adam

AU - Young, Liane

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Moral psychology has begun to characterize the circumstances that lead people to commit moral violations. However, the decision to engage in corrupt behaviour may not always reflect a choice between right and wrong. Rather, the decision may represent a trade-off between competing moral concerns (for example, being fair and impartial to all versus loyal to one's own group). Taking the tension between fairness and loyalty as a case study, we demonstrate that the way people make trade-offs between competing moral norms predicts morally relevant behaviour, such as decisions to blow the whistle on unethical acts. We then suggest that this tension reflects a deeper distinction within our moral psychology, namely, a distinction between group-based norms (for example, loyalty) and norms that apply universally, independent of group membership (for example, fairness). Finally, we discuss what factors may influence the adoption of group-based versus groupindependent norms and therefore, how these factors might deter or promote corruption.

AB - Moral psychology has begun to characterize the circumstances that lead people to commit moral violations. However, the decision to engage in corrupt behaviour may not always reflect a choice between right and wrong. Rather, the decision may represent a trade-off between competing moral concerns (for example, being fair and impartial to all versus loyal to one's own group). Taking the tension between fairness and loyalty as a case study, we demonstrate that the way people make trade-offs between competing moral norms predicts morally relevant behaviour, such as decisions to blow the whistle on unethical acts. We then suggest that this tension reflects a deeper distinction within our moral psychology, namely, a distinction between group-based norms (for example, loyalty) and norms that apply universally, independent of group membership (for example, fairness). Finally, we discuss what factors may influence the adoption of group-based versus groupindependent norms and therefore, how these factors might deter or promote corruption.

KW - Corruption

KW - Fairness

KW - Hypocrisy

KW - Loyalty

KW - Whistle-blowing

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908509647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84908509647&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0260107914540832

DO - 10.1177/0260107914540832

M3 - Review article

VL - 26

SP - 97

EP - 118

JO - Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics

JF - Journal of Interdisciplinary Economics

SN - 0260-1079

IS - 1-2

ER -