TY - JOUR
T1 - Cost of Thoracotomy Approach
T2 - An Analysis of the LATERAL Trial
AU - Mokadam, Nahush A.
AU - McGee, Edwin
AU - Wieselthaler, Georg
AU - Pham, Duc Thinh
AU - Bailey, Stephen H.
AU - Pretorius, G. Victor
AU - Boeve, Theodore J.
AU - Ismyrloglou, Eleni
AU - Strueber, Martin
N1 - Funding Information:
The analysis was supported financially by Medtronic, Inc. The authors wish to acknowledge Mary V. Jacoski, MS, Alexandra Dedrick, and Stelios I. Tsintzos, MD, of Medtronic for their support on this project.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons
PY - 2020/11
Y1 - 2020/11
N2 - Background: Less invasive techniques for left ventricular assist device implantation have been increasingly prevalent over past years and have been associated with improved clinical outcomes. The procedural economic impact of these techniques remains unknown. We sought to study and report economic outcomes associated with the thoracotomy implantation approach. Methods: The LATERAL clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of the thoracotomy approach for implantation of the HeartWare centrifugal-flow ventricular assist device system (HVAD). We collected UB-04 forms in parallel to the trial, allowing analysis of index hospitalization costs. All charges were converted to costs using hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios and were subsequently compared with Medicare cost data for the same period (2015-2016). Because thoracotomy implants were off-label for all left ventricular assist devices during that period, the Medicare cohort was assumed to consist predominately of traditional sternotomy patients. Results: Thoracotomy patients demonstrated decreased costs compared with sternotomy patients during the index hospitalization. Mean total index hospitalization costs for thoracotomy were $204,107 per patient, corresponding to 21.6% reduction (P < .001) and $56,385 savings per procedure compared with sternotomy. Across almost all cost categories, thoracotomy implants were less costly. Conclusions: In LATERAL, a clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the thoracotomy approach for HVAD, costs were lower than those reported in Medicare patient claims occurring over the same period. Because Medicare data can be presumed to consist of predominately sternotomy procedures, thoracotomy appears less expensive than traditional sternotomy.
AB - Background: Less invasive techniques for left ventricular assist device implantation have been increasingly prevalent over past years and have been associated with improved clinical outcomes. The procedural economic impact of these techniques remains unknown. We sought to study and report economic outcomes associated with the thoracotomy implantation approach. Methods: The LATERAL clinical trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of the thoracotomy approach for implantation of the HeartWare centrifugal-flow ventricular assist device system (HVAD). We collected UB-04 forms in parallel to the trial, allowing analysis of index hospitalization costs. All charges were converted to costs using hospital-specific cost-to-charge ratios and were subsequently compared with Medicare cost data for the same period (2015-2016). Because thoracotomy implants were off-label for all left ventricular assist devices during that period, the Medicare cohort was assumed to consist predominately of traditional sternotomy patients. Results: Thoracotomy patients demonstrated decreased costs compared with sternotomy patients during the index hospitalization. Mean total index hospitalization costs for thoracotomy were $204,107 per patient, corresponding to 21.6% reduction (P < .001) and $56,385 savings per procedure compared with sternotomy. Across almost all cost categories, thoracotomy implants were less costly. Conclusions: In LATERAL, a clinical trial evaluating the safety and efficacy of the thoracotomy approach for HVAD, costs were lower than those reported in Medicare patient claims occurring over the same period. Because Medicare data can be presumed to consist of predominately sternotomy procedures, thoracotomy appears less expensive than traditional sternotomy.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85090300028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85090300028&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.047
DO - 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2020.02.047
M3 - Article
C2 - 32224242
AN - SCOPUS:85090300028
SN - 0003-4975
VL - 110
SP - 1512
EP - 1519
JO - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
JF - Annals of Thoracic Surgery
IS - 5
ER -