Costly signaling and cheap talk in models of political influence

David Austen-Smith*, Jeffrey S. Banks

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

The motivation for the paper is that, insofar as agents can inflict self-imposed utility losses, purely cheap talk communication is never the only available instrument for information transmission. Given this and the importance of recent work applying cheap talk models to understand a variety of political phenomena, we explore two related questions for the theory. First, what are the equilibrium implications for cheap talk communication when an informed agent is free to use both costless and costly signals and, second, what are the consequences of allowing both sorts of signal for the widespread use of ex ante welfare comparisons as a basis for predictions on the degree of information transmission or institutional choice?

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)263-280
Number of pages18
JournalEuropean Journal of Political Economy
Volume18
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2002

Funding

The comments of the anonymous referees much improved this paper and the NSF kindly provided support under grant SBR-9804877. But more than anything, Austen-Smith thanks Jeffrey S. Banks for being his friend and colleague until the day he died.

Keywords

  • Cheap talk
  • Costly signaling
  • Refinements

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Costly signaling and cheap talk in models of political influence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this