TY - JOUR
T1 - Critical theoretical frameworks in engineering education
T2 - An anti-deficit and liberative approach
AU - Mejia, Joel Alejandro
AU - Revelo, Renata A.
AU - Villanueva, Idalis
AU - Mejia, Janice
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding: This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DRL-1644976 and EEC-1653140. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material does not necessarily reflect those of NSF.
Funding Information:
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) under Grant No. DRL-1644976 and EEC-1653140. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material does not necessarily reflect those of NSF.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2018/12
Y1 - 2018/12
N2 - The field of engineering education has adapted different theoretical frameworks from a wide range of disciplines to explore issues of education, diversity, and inclusion among others. The number of theoretical frameworks that explore these issues using a critical perspective has been increasing in the past few years. In this review of the literature, we present an analysis that draws from Freire’s principles of critical andragogy and pedagogy. Using a set of inclusion criteria, we selected 33 research articles that used critical theoretical frameworks as part of our systematic review of the literature. We argue that critical theoretical frameworks are necessary to develop anti-deficit approaches to engineering education research. We show how engineering education research could frame questions and guide research designs using critical theoretical frameworks for the purpose of liberation.
AB - The field of engineering education has adapted different theoretical frameworks from a wide range of disciplines to explore issues of education, diversity, and inclusion among others. The number of theoretical frameworks that explore these issues using a critical perspective has been increasing in the past few years. In this review of the literature, we present an analysis that draws from Freire’s principles of critical andragogy and pedagogy. Using a set of inclusion criteria, we selected 33 research articles that used critical theoretical frameworks as part of our systematic review of the literature. We argue that critical theoretical frameworks are necessary to develop anti-deficit approaches to engineering education research. We show how engineering education research could frame questions and guide research designs using critical theoretical frameworks for the purpose of liberation.
KW - Anti-deficit approach
KW - Critical pedagogy
KW - Critical theoretical frameworks
KW - Engineering education research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85061195616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85061195616&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/educsci8040158
DO - 10.3390/educsci8040158
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85061195616
SN - 2227-7102
VL - 8
JO - Education Sciences
JF - Education Sciences
IS - 4
M1 - 158
ER -