Cross-talk in otoacoustic emission probes

J. H. Siegel*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective: Several commercial otoacoustic emission probes (Virtual 330, Etymōtic Research ER-10 and ER-1OB, and Otodynamics IL088 and IL092) were tested for internal coupling (cross-talk) between the sound source and probe microphone. Design: The response of the probe under test was measured, in a cavity that simulates the human ear canal, first in its normal configuration and then with either the sound source tube or the microphone inlet blocked with modelling clay. Cross-talk was indicated if the pressure failed to drop substantially in the “blocked” condition. Results: Cross-talk in the Virtual 330 and Etymōtic ER-1OB was found to be severe enough to compromise the accuracy of “in the ear” acoustic calibrations. In both cases the cause was the radiation of sound through the walls of the flexible silicone tubing used to conduct the stimuli through the body of the probe. Substituting harder-walled sound source tubing reduced cross-talk to levels acceptable for routine application. The probes used in the Otodynamics IL088 and ILO92 systems and the original Etymōtic ERlO probes all have acceptably low cross-talk as supplied from the manufacturers. Conclusions: For the two probes where excessive cross-talk was found, most of the cross-talk was acoustic and/or mechanical, rather than electromagnetic. Artifacts due to cross-talk have undoubtedly contaminated data collected with these units. Manufacturers of emission probes are urged to adopt a standard for specifying cross-talk levels and include this specification in product literature.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)150-158
Number of pages9
JournalEar and hearing
Volume16
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1995

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Otorhinolaryngology
  • Speech and Hearing

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Cross-talk in otoacoustic emission probes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this