Culture and negotiation strategy

A framework for future research

Jeanne Brett, Brian C. Gunia, Brosh M. Teucher

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The literature on the use and effectiveness of negotiation strategies reveals intriguing yet unexplained patterns of cultural differences. Negotiators in some regions of the world rely on the questions and answers (Q&A) strategy, typically associated with high trust and high joint gains, while negotiators in other regions of the world rely on the substantiation and offers (S&O) strategy, typically associated with low trust and low joint gains. Yet negotiators from some low-trust cultures use Q&A, negotiators from some high-trust cultures use S&O, and negotiators from some cultures achieve low joint gains through Q&A or high joint gains through S&O. To explain these anomalies, we propose an integrated framework involving three constructs from cultural psychology: cultural levels of trust, tightness-looseness, and holistic versus analytic mindset. Specifically, we propose that the interaction between trust and tightness-looseness can explain cultural differences in the use of negotiation strategies, while the interaction of these strategies with holistic versus analytic mindset can explain cultural differences in the effectiveness of negotiation strategies. In sum, we extend the boundaries of current research to develop a cultural rationale for anomalies in extant research, encouraging negotiation and management researchers to consider new constructs as their research "goes global.".

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)288-308
Number of pages21
JournalAcademy of Management Perspectives
Volume31
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 1 2017

Fingerprint

Negotiation strategy
Cultural differences
Interaction
Anomaly
Mindset
Integrated
Rationale
Psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Business and International Management
  • Strategy and Management
  • Marketing

Cite this

Brett, Jeanne ; Gunia, Brian C. ; Teucher, Brosh M. / Culture and negotiation strategy : A framework for future research. In: Academy of Management Perspectives. 2017 ; Vol. 31, No. 4. pp. 288-308.
@article{29b20fa928224c59b3fa7339fa928f91,
title = "Culture and negotiation strategy: A framework for future research",
abstract = "The literature on the use and effectiveness of negotiation strategies reveals intriguing yet unexplained patterns of cultural differences. Negotiators in some regions of the world rely on the questions and answers (Q&A) strategy, typically associated with high trust and high joint gains, while negotiators in other regions of the world rely on the substantiation and offers (S&O) strategy, typically associated with low trust and low joint gains. Yet negotiators from some low-trust cultures use Q&A, negotiators from some high-trust cultures use S&O, and negotiators from some cultures achieve low joint gains through Q&A or high joint gains through S&O. To explain these anomalies, we propose an integrated framework involving three constructs from cultural psychology: cultural levels of trust, tightness-looseness, and holistic versus analytic mindset. Specifically, we propose that the interaction between trust and tightness-looseness can explain cultural differences in the use of negotiation strategies, while the interaction of these strategies with holistic versus analytic mindset can explain cultural differences in the effectiveness of negotiation strategies. In sum, we extend the boundaries of current research to develop a cultural rationale for anomalies in extant research, encouraging negotiation and management researchers to consider new constructs as their research {"}goes global.{"}.",
author = "Jeanne Brett and Gunia, {Brian C.} and Teucher, {Brosh M.}",
year = "2017",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5465/amp.2015.0195",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "288--308",
journal = "Academy of Management Perspectives",
issn = "1558-9080",
publisher = "Academy of Management",
number = "4",

}

Culture and negotiation strategy : A framework for future research. / Brett, Jeanne; Gunia, Brian C.; Teucher, Brosh M.

In: Academy of Management Perspectives, Vol. 31, No. 4, 01.11.2017, p. 288-308.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Culture and negotiation strategy

T2 - A framework for future research

AU - Brett, Jeanne

AU - Gunia, Brian C.

AU - Teucher, Brosh M.

PY - 2017/11/1

Y1 - 2017/11/1

N2 - The literature on the use and effectiveness of negotiation strategies reveals intriguing yet unexplained patterns of cultural differences. Negotiators in some regions of the world rely on the questions and answers (Q&A) strategy, typically associated with high trust and high joint gains, while negotiators in other regions of the world rely on the substantiation and offers (S&O) strategy, typically associated with low trust and low joint gains. Yet negotiators from some low-trust cultures use Q&A, negotiators from some high-trust cultures use S&O, and negotiators from some cultures achieve low joint gains through Q&A or high joint gains through S&O. To explain these anomalies, we propose an integrated framework involving three constructs from cultural psychology: cultural levels of trust, tightness-looseness, and holistic versus analytic mindset. Specifically, we propose that the interaction between trust and tightness-looseness can explain cultural differences in the use of negotiation strategies, while the interaction of these strategies with holistic versus analytic mindset can explain cultural differences in the effectiveness of negotiation strategies. In sum, we extend the boundaries of current research to develop a cultural rationale for anomalies in extant research, encouraging negotiation and management researchers to consider new constructs as their research "goes global.".

AB - The literature on the use and effectiveness of negotiation strategies reveals intriguing yet unexplained patterns of cultural differences. Negotiators in some regions of the world rely on the questions and answers (Q&A) strategy, typically associated with high trust and high joint gains, while negotiators in other regions of the world rely on the substantiation and offers (S&O) strategy, typically associated with low trust and low joint gains. Yet negotiators from some low-trust cultures use Q&A, negotiators from some high-trust cultures use S&O, and negotiators from some cultures achieve low joint gains through Q&A or high joint gains through S&O. To explain these anomalies, we propose an integrated framework involving three constructs from cultural psychology: cultural levels of trust, tightness-looseness, and holistic versus analytic mindset. Specifically, we propose that the interaction between trust and tightness-looseness can explain cultural differences in the use of negotiation strategies, while the interaction of these strategies with holistic versus analytic mindset can explain cultural differences in the effectiveness of negotiation strategies. In sum, we extend the boundaries of current research to develop a cultural rationale for anomalies in extant research, encouraging negotiation and management researchers to consider new constructs as their research "goes global.".

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040338660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040338660&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5465/amp.2015.0195

DO - 10.5465/amp.2015.0195

M3 - Article

VL - 31

SP - 288

EP - 308

JO - Academy of Management Perspectives

JF - Academy of Management Perspectives

SN - 1558-9080

IS - 4

ER -