Current practices in meta-regression in psychology, education, and medicine

Elizabeth Tipton*, James E. Pustejovsky, Hedyeh Ahmadi

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Having surveyed the history and methods of meta-regression in a previous paper, in this paper, we review which and how meta-regression methods are applied in recent research syntheses. To do so, we reviewed studies published in 2016 across four leading research synthesis journals: Psychological Bulletin, the Journal of Applied Psychology, Review of Educational Research, and the Cochrane Library. We find that the best practices defined in the previous review are rarely carried out in practice. In light of the identified discrepancies, we consider how to move forward, first by identifying areas where further methods development is needed to address persistent problems in the field and second by discussing how to more effectively disseminate points of methodological consensus.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)180-194
Number of pages15
JournalResearch synthesis methods
Volume10
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2019

Fingerprint

psychology
medicine
regression
education
bulletin
educational research
best practice
history

Keywords

  • education
  • medicine
  • meta-regression
  • moderators
  • practice
  • psychology

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education

Cite this

Tipton, Elizabeth ; Pustejovsky, James E. ; Ahmadi, Hedyeh. / Current practices in meta-regression in psychology, education, and medicine. In: Research synthesis methods. 2019 ; Vol. 10, No. 2. pp. 180-194.
@article{61aa284e3221463f95089986e16e7762,
title = "Current practices in meta-regression in psychology, education, and medicine",
abstract = "Having surveyed the history and methods of meta-regression in a previous paper, in this paper, we review which and how meta-regression methods are applied in recent research syntheses. To do so, we reviewed studies published in 2016 across four leading research synthesis journals: Psychological Bulletin, the Journal of Applied Psychology, Review of Educational Research, and the Cochrane Library. We find that the best practices defined in the previous review are rarely carried out in practice. In light of the identified discrepancies, we consider how to move forward, first by identifying areas where further methods development is needed to address persistent problems in the field and second by discussing how to more effectively disseminate points of methodological consensus.",
keywords = "education, medicine, meta-regression, moderators, practice, psychology",
author = "Elizabeth Tipton and Pustejovsky, {James E.} and Hedyeh Ahmadi",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1002/jrsm.1339",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "10",
pages = "180--194",
journal = "Research Synthesis Methods",
issn = "1759-2879",
publisher = "John Wiley and Sons Ltd",
number = "2",

}

Current practices in meta-regression in psychology, education, and medicine. / Tipton, Elizabeth; Pustejovsky, James E.; Ahmadi, Hedyeh.

In: Research synthesis methods, Vol. 10, No. 2, 01.06.2019, p. 180-194.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current practices in meta-regression in psychology, education, and medicine

AU - Tipton, Elizabeth

AU - Pustejovsky, James E.

AU - Ahmadi, Hedyeh

PY - 2019/6/1

Y1 - 2019/6/1

N2 - Having surveyed the history and methods of meta-regression in a previous paper, in this paper, we review which and how meta-regression methods are applied in recent research syntheses. To do so, we reviewed studies published in 2016 across four leading research synthesis journals: Psychological Bulletin, the Journal of Applied Psychology, Review of Educational Research, and the Cochrane Library. We find that the best practices defined in the previous review are rarely carried out in practice. In light of the identified discrepancies, we consider how to move forward, first by identifying areas where further methods development is needed to address persistent problems in the field and second by discussing how to more effectively disseminate points of methodological consensus.

AB - Having surveyed the history and methods of meta-regression in a previous paper, in this paper, we review which and how meta-regression methods are applied in recent research syntheses. To do so, we reviewed studies published in 2016 across four leading research synthesis journals: Psychological Bulletin, the Journal of Applied Psychology, Review of Educational Research, and the Cochrane Library. We find that the best practices defined in the previous review are rarely carried out in practice. In light of the identified discrepancies, we consider how to move forward, first by identifying areas where further methods development is needed to address persistent problems in the field and second by discussing how to more effectively disseminate points of methodological consensus.

KW - education

KW - medicine

KW - meta-regression

KW - moderators

KW - practice

KW - psychology

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066958166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066958166&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1002/jrsm.1339

DO - 10.1002/jrsm.1339

M3 - Article

C2 - 30616301

AN - SCOPUS:85066958166

VL - 10

SP - 180

EP - 194

JO - Research Synthesis Methods

JF - Research Synthesis Methods

SN - 1759-2879

IS - 2

ER -