Current procedural terminology coding for surgical pathology

A review and one academic center’s experience with pathologist-verified coding

Audrey Deeken-Draisey, Allison Ritchie, Guang-Yu Yang, Margaret Quinn, Linda M. Ernst, Ajda Guttormsen, Gyongyi Ella Simionov, Kruti P Maniar*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Context.—The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system is a standardized numerical coding system for reporting medical procedures and services, and is the basis for reimbursement of health care providers by Medicare and other third-party payers. Accurate CPT coding is therefore crucial for appropriate compensation as well as for compliance with Medicare policies, and erroneous coding may result in loss of revenues and/or significant monetary penalties for a hospital or practice. Objective.—To provide a review of the history, current state, and basic principles of CPT coding, in particular as it applies to the practice of surgical pathology, and to present our experience with initiating a new system of pathologist involvement in the review and verification of CPT codes, including the most common codes that require modification in our practice at the time of sign-out or post–sign-out auditing. Data Sources.—Review of English language literature, published CPT resources from the American Medical Association and other professional organizations, and billing quality data from a single institution. Conclusions.—Although the appropriate extent of physician involvement in CPT coding is a matter of some debate, a multidisciplinary approach involving both health care providers and professional coders appears to be the best way to achieve accuracy.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1524-1532
Number of pages9
JournalArchives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine
Volume142
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

Fingerprint

Current Procedural Terminology
Surgical Pathology
Medicare
Health Personnel
Health Insurance Reimbursement
Information Storage and Retrieval
American Medical Association
Pathologists
Language
History
Physicians

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Medical Laboratory Technology

Cite this

Deeken-Draisey, Audrey ; Ritchie, Allison ; Yang, Guang-Yu ; Quinn, Margaret ; Ernst, Linda M. ; Guttormsen, Ajda ; Ella Simionov, Gyongyi ; Maniar, Kruti P. / Current procedural terminology coding for surgical pathology : A review and one academic center’s experience with pathologist-verified coding. In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2018 ; Vol. 142, No. 12. pp. 1524-1532.
@article{d52d25b0f65147fab070b3f9420bbc68,
title = "Current procedural terminology coding for surgical pathology: A review and one academic center’s experience with pathologist-verified coding",
abstract = "Context.—The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system is a standardized numerical coding system for reporting medical procedures and services, and is the basis for reimbursement of health care providers by Medicare and other third-party payers. Accurate CPT coding is therefore crucial for appropriate compensation as well as for compliance with Medicare policies, and erroneous coding may result in loss of revenues and/or significant monetary penalties for a hospital or practice. Objective.—To provide a review of the history, current state, and basic principles of CPT coding, in particular as it applies to the practice of surgical pathology, and to present our experience with initiating a new system of pathologist involvement in the review and verification of CPT codes, including the most common codes that require modification in our practice at the time of sign-out or post–sign-out auditing. Data Sources.—Review of English language literature, published CPT resources from the American Medical Association and other professional organizations, and billing quality data from a single institution. Conclusions.—Although the appropriate extent of physician involvement in CPT coding is a matter of some debate, a multidisciplinary approach involving both health care providers and professional coders appears to be the best way to achieve accuracy.",
author = "Audrey Deeken-Draisey and Allison Ritchie and Guang-Yu Yang and Margaret Quinn and Ernst, {Linda M.} and Ajda Guttormsen and {Ella Simionov}, Gyongyi and Maniar, {Kruti P}",
year = "2018",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.5858/arpa.2017-0190-RA",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "142",
pages = "1524--1532",
journal = "Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine",
issn = "0003-9985",
publisher = "College of American Pathologists",
number = "12",

}

Current procedural terminology coding for surgical pathology : A review and one academic center’s experience with pathologist-verified coding. / Deeken-Draisey, Audrey; Ritchie, Allison; Yang, Guang-Yu; Quinn, Margaret; Ernst, Linda M.; Guttormsen, Ajda; Ella Simionov, Gyongyi; Maniar, Kruti P.

In: Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Vol. 142, No. 12, 01.12.2018, p. 1524-1532.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Current procedural terminology coding for surgical pathology

T2 - A review and one academic center’s experience with pathologist-verified coding

AU - Deeken-Draisey, Audrey

AU - Ritchie, Allison

AU - Yang, Guang-Yu

AU - Quinn, Margaret

AU - Ernst, Linda M.

AU - Guttormsen, Ajda

AU - Ella Simionov, Gyongyi

AU - Maniar, Kruti P

PY - 2018/12/1

Y1 - 2018/12/1

N2 - Context.—The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system is a standardized numerical coding system for reporting medical procedures and services, and is the basis for reimbursement of health care providers by Medicare and other third-party payers. Accurate CPT coding is therefore crucial for appropriate compensation as well as for compliance with Medicare policies, and erroneous coding may result in loss of revenues and/or significant monetary penalties for a hospital or practice. Objective.—To provide a review of the history, current state, and basic principles of CPT coding, in particular as it applies to the practice of surgical pathology, and to present our experience with initiating a new system of pathologist involvement in the review and verification of CPT codes, including the most common codes that require modification in our practice at the time of sign-out or post–sign-out auditing. Data Sources.—Review of English language literature, published CPT resources from the American Medical Association and other professional organizations, and billing quality data from a single institution. Conclusions.—Although the appropriate extent of physician involvement in CPT coding is a matter of some debate, a multidisciplinary approach involving both health care providers and professional coders appears to be the best way to achieve accuracy.

AB - Context.—The Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) system is a standardized numerical coding system for reporting medical procedures and services, and is the basis for reimbursement of health care providers by Medicare and other third-party payers. Accurate CPT coding is therefore crucial for appropriate compensation as well as for compliance with Medicare policies, and erroneous coding may result in loss of revenues and/or significant monetary penalties for a hospital or practice. Objective.—To provide a review of the history, current state, and basic principles of CPT coding, in particular as it applies to the practice of surgical pathology, and to present our experience with initiating a new system of pathologist involvement in the review and verification of CPT codes, including the most common codes that require modification in our practice at the time of sign-out or post–sign-out auditing. Data Sources.—Review of English language literature, published CPT resources from the American Medical Association and other professional organizations, and billing quality data from a single institution. Conclusions.—Although the appropriate extent of physician involvement in CPT coding is a matter of some debate, a multidisciplinary approach involving both health care providers and professional coders appears to be the best way to achieve accuracy.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85057601415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85057601415&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.5858/arpa.2017-0190-RA

DO - 10.5858/arpa.2017-0190-RA

M3 - Article

VL - 142

SP - 1524

EP - 1532

JO - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

JF - Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine

SN - 0003-9985

IS - 12

ER -