TY - JOUR
T1 - Deconstructing community-based collaborative design
T2 - Towards more equitable participatory design engagements
AU - Harrington, Christina N.
AU - Erete, Sheena
AU - Piper, Anne Marie
N1 - Funding Information:
The projects in these case studies were sponsored and funded by NSF grant IIS-1551574 and by City Tech. We extend a gracious thank you to the community partners that engaged in this research and allowed us into their lives and to tell their stories. We would also like to thank Enid Montague and Jessa Dickinson for their feedback on early drafts of this paper.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM.
PY - 2019/11
Y1 - 2019/11
N2 - Participatory Design (PD) is envisioned as an approach to democratizing innovation in the design process by shifting the power dynamics between researcher and participant. Recent scholarship in HCI and design has analyzed the ways collaborative design engagements, such as PD situated in the design workshop can amplify voices and empower underserved populations. Yet, we argue that PD as instantiated in the design workshop is very much an affluent and privileged activity that often neglects the challenges associated with envisioning equitable design solutions among underserved populations. Based on two series of community-based PD workshops with underserved populations in the U.S., we highlight key areas of tension and considerations for a more equitable PD approach: historical context of the research environment, community access, perceptions of materials and activities, and unintentional harm in collecting full accounts of personal narratives. By reflecting on these tensions as a call-to-action, we hope to deconstruct the privilege of the PD workshop within HCI and re-center the focus of design on individuals who are historically underserved.
AB - Participatory Design (PD) is envisioned as an approach to democratizing innovation in the design process by shifting the power dynamics between researcher and participant. Recent scholarship in HCI and design has analyzed the ways collaborative design engagements, such as PD situated in the design workshop can amplify voices and empower underserved populations. Yet, we argue that PD as instantiated in the design workshop is very much an affluent and privileged activity that often neglects the challenges associated with envisioning equitable design solutions among underserved populations. Based on two series of community-based PD workshops with underserved populations in the U.S., we highlight key areas of tension and considerations for a more equitable PD approach: historical context of the research environment, community access, perceptions of materials and activities, and unintentional harm in collecting full accounts of personal narratives. By reflecting on these tensions as a call-to-action, we hope to deconstruct the privilege of the PD workshop within HCI and re-center the focus of design on individuals who are historically underserved.
KW - Community-based participatory design
KW - Design equity
KW - Design workshops
KW - Social action research
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075041532&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85075041532&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1145/3359318
DO - 10.1145/3359318
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85075041532
SN - 2573-0142
VL - 3
JO - Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
JF - Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
IS - CSCW
M1 - 216
ER -