TY - JOUR
T1 - Deep Gaussian Processes for Classification With Multiple Noisy Annotators. Application to Breast Cancer Tissue Classification
AU - Lopez-Perez, Miguel
AU - Morales-Alvarez, Pablo
AU - Cooper, Lee A.D.
AU - Molina, Rafael
AU - Katsaggelos, Aggelos K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 IEEE.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Machine learning (ML) methods often require large volumes of labeled data to achieve meaningful performance. The expertise necessary for labeling data in medical applications like pathology presents a significant challenge in developing clinical-grade tools. Crowdsourcing approaches address this challenge by collecting labels from multiple annotators with varying degrees of expertise. In recent years, multiple methods have been adapted to learn from noisy crowdsourced labels. Among them, Gaussian Processes (GPs) have achieved excellent performance due to their ability to model uncertainty. Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) address the limitations of GPs using multiple layers to enable the learning of more complex representations. In this work, we develop Deep Gaussian Processes for Crowdsourcing (DGPCR) to model the crowdsourcing problem with DGPs for the first time. DGPCR models the (unknown) underlying true labels, and the behavior of each annotator is modeled with a confusion matrix among classes. We use end-to-end variational inference to estimate both DGPCR parameters and annotator biases. Using annotations from 25 pathologists and medical trainees, we show that DGPCR is competitive or superior to Scalable Gaussian Processes for Crowdsourcing (SVGPCR) and other state-of-the-art deep-learning crowdsourcing methods for breast cancer classification. Also, we observe that DGPCR with noisy labels obtains better results ( $\text{F}1=81.91$ %) than GPs ( $\text{F}1=81.57$ %) and deep learning methods ( $\text{F}1=80.88$ %) with true labels curated by experts. Finally, we show an improved estimation of annotators' behavior.
AB - Machine learning (ML) methods often require large volumes of labeled data to achieve meaningful performance. The expertise necessary for labeling data in medical applications like pathology presents a significant challenge in developing clinical-grade tools. Crowdsourcing approaches address this challenge by collecting labels from multiple annotators with varying degrees of expertise. In recent years, multiple methods have been adapted to learn from noisy crowdsourced labels. Among them, Gaussian Processes (GPs) have achieved excellent performance due to their ability to model uncertainty. Deep Gaussian Processes (DGPs) address the limitations of GPs using multiple layers to enable the learning of more complex representations. In this work, we develop Deep Gaussian Processes for Crowdsourcing (DGPCR) to model the crowdsourcing problem with DGPs for the first time. DGPCR models the (unknown) underlying true labels, and the behavior of each annotator is modeled with a confusion matrix among classes. We use end-to-end variational inference to estimate both DGPCR parameters and annotator biases. Using annotations from 25 pathologists and medical trainees, we show that DGPCR is competitive or superior to Scalable Gaussian Processes for Crowdsourcing (SVGPCR) and other state-of-the-art deep-learning crowdsourcing methods for breast cancer classification. Also, we observe that DGPCR with noisy labels obtains better results ( $\text{F}1=81.91$ %) than GPs ( $\text{F}1=81.57$ %) and deep learning methods ( $\text{F}1=80.88$ %) with true labels curated by experts. Finally, we show an improved estimation of annotators' behavior.
KW - Crowdsourcing
KW - breast cancer
KW - deep Gaussian processes
KW - digital pathology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85147290228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85147290228&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3237990
DO - 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3237990
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85147290228
SN - 2169-3536
VL - 11
SP - 6922
EP - 6934
JO - IEEE Access
JF - IEEE Access
ER -