TY - JOUR
T1 - Deep learning prediction of voxel-level liver stiffness in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
AU - Pollack, Brian L.
AU - Batmanghelich, Kayhan
AU - Cai, Stephen S.
AU - Gordon, Emile
AU - Wallace, Stephen
AU - Catania, Roberta
AU - Morillo-Hernandez, Carlos
AU - Furlan, Alessandro
AU - Borhani, Amir A.
N1 - Funding Information:
A.A.B. supported by Pittsburgh Liver Research Center’s Pilot and Feasibility program, funded by grant P30DK120531 from National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, NIH. B.L.P., K.B. supported by a grant from the NIH (1R-1Hl141813-01), National Science Foundation (grant number 1839332), and SAP SE (research grant), and Pittsburgh Liver Research Center (P&F Award P30 DK1120531). Additional funding was provided by a National Library of Medicine Training Grant.
Publisher Copyright:
© RSNA, 2021.
PY - 2021/11
Y1 - 2021/11
N2 - Purpose: To reconstruct virtual MR elastography (MRE) images based on traditional MRI inputs with a machine learning algorithm. Materials and Methods: In this single-institution, retrospective study, 149 patients (mean age, 58 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 71 men) with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease who underwent MRI and MRE between January 2016 and January 2019 were evaluated. Nine conventional MRI sequences and clinical data were used to train a convolutional neural network to reconstruct MRE images at the per-voxel level. The architecture was further modified to accept multichannel three-dimensional inputs and to allow inclusion of clinical and demographic information. Liver stiffness and fibrosis category (F0 [no fibrosis] to F4 [significant fibrosis]) of reconstructed images were assessed by using voxel-and patient-level agreement by correlation, sensitivity, and specificity calculations; in addition, classification by receiver operator characteristic analyses was performed, and Dice score was used to evaluate hepatic stiffness locality. Results: The model for predicting liver stiffness incorporated four image sequences (precontrast T1-weighted liver acquisition with volume acquisition [LAVA] water and LAVA fat, 120-second–delay T1-weighted LAVA water, and single-shot fast spin-echo T2 weighted) and clinical data. The model had a patient-level and voxel-level correlation of 0.50 ± 0.05 and 0.34 ± 0.03, respectively. By using a stiffness threshold of 3.54 kPa to make a binary classification into no fibrosis or mild fibrosis (F0–F1) versus clinically significant fibro-sis (F2–F4), the model had sensitivity of 80% ± 4, specificity of 75% ± 5, accuracy of 78% ± 3, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 84 ± 0.04, and a Dice score of 0.74. Conclusion: The generation of virtual elastography images is feasible by using conventional MRI and clinical data with a machine learning algorithm.
AB - Purpose: To reconstruct virtual MR elastography (MRE) images based on traditional MRI inputs with a machine learning algorithm. Materials and Methods: In this single-institution, retrospective study, 149 patients (mean age, 58 years ± 12 [standard deviation]; 71 men) with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease who underwent MRI and MRE between January 2016 and January 2019 were evaluated. Nine conventional MRI sequences and clinical data were used to train a convolutional neural network to reconstruct MRE images at the per-voxel level. The architecture was further modified to accept multichannel three-dimensional inputs and to allow inclusion of clinical and demographic information. Liver stiffness and fibrosis category (F0 [no fibrosis] to F4 [significant fibrosis]) of reconstructed images were assessed by using voxel-and patient-level agreement by correlation, sensitivity, and specificity calculations; in addition, classification by receiver operator characteristic analyses was performed, and Dice score was used to evaluate hepatic stiffness locality. Results: The model for predicting liver stiffness incorporated four image sequences (precontrast T1-weighted liver acquisition with volume acquisition [LAVA] water and LAVA fat, 120-second–delay T1-weighted LAVA water, and single-shot fast spin-echo T2 weighted) and clinical data. The model had a patient-level and voxel-level correlation of 0.50 ± 0.05 and 0.34 ± 0.03, respectively. By using a stiffness threshold of 3.54 kPa to make a binary classification into no fibrosis or mild fibrosis (F0–F1) versus clinically significant fibro-sis (F2–F4), the model had sensitivity of 80% ± 4, specificity of 75% ± 5, accuracy of 78% ± 3, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 84 ± 0.04, and a Dice score of 0.74. Conclusion: The generation of virtual elastography images is feasible by using conventional MRI and clinical data with a machine learning algorithm.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120585451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120585451&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1148/ryai.2021200274
DO - 10.1148/ryai.2021200274
M3 - Article
C2 - 34870213
AN - SCOPUS:85120585451
SN - 2638-6100
VL - 3
JO - Radiology: Artificial Intelligence
JF - Radiology: Artificial Intelligence
IS - 6
M1 - e200274
ER -