TY - JOUR
T1 - Defense of the PACE trial is based on argumentation fallacies
AU - Lubet, Steven
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2017.
PY - 2017/8/1
Y1 - 2017/8/1
N2 - In defense of the PACE trial, Petrie and Weinman employ a series of misleading or fallacious argumentation techniques, including circularity, blaming the victim, bait and switch, non-sequitur, setting up a straw person, guilt by association, red herring, and the parade of horribles. These are described and explained.
AB - In defense of the PACE trial, Petrie and Weinman employ a series of misleading or fallacious argumentation techniques, including circularity, blaming the victim, bait and switch, non-sequitur, setting up a straw person, guilt by association, red herring, and the parade of horribles. These are described and explained.
KW - PACE trial
KW - beliefs
KW - chronic fatigue syndrome
KW - health beliefs
KW - myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026777146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85026777146&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/1359105317712523
DO - 10.1177/1359105317712523
M3 - Review article
C2 - 28805515
AN - SCOPUS:85026777146
SN - 1359-1053
VL - 22
SP - 1201
EP - 1205
JO - Journal of Health Psychology
JF - Journal of Health Psychology
IS - 9
ER -