Defensive Medicine and Obstetric Practices

Michael Frakes*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

41 Scopus citations

Abstract

Using data on physician behavior from the 1979-2005 National Hospital Discharge Surveys (NHDS), I estimate the relationship between malpractice pressure, as identified by the adoption of noneconomic damage caps and related tort reforms, and certain decisions faced by obstetricians during the delivery of a child. The NHDS data, supplemented with restricted geographic identifiers, provides inpatient discharge records from a broad enough span of states and covering a long enough period of time to allow for a defensive medicine analysis that draws on an extensive set of variations in relevant tort laws. Contrary to the conventional wisdom, I find no evidence to support the claim that malpractice pressure induces physicians to perform a substantially greater number of cesarean sections. Extending this analysis to certain additional measures, however, I do find some evidence consistent with positive defensive behavior among obstetricians. For instance, I estimate that the adoption of a noneconomic damage cap is associated with a reduction in the utilization of episiotomies during vaginal deliveries, without a corresponding change in observed neonatal outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)457-481
Number of pages25
JournalJournal of Empirical Legal Studies
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Defensive Medicine and Obstetric Practices'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this