Defining the autonomy gap

When expectations do not meet reality in the operating room

Shari Lynn Meyerson*, Ezra Nathaniel Teitelbaum, Brian C. George, Mary C. Schuller, Debra DaRosa, Jonathan Paul Fryer

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

46 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective To develop operative independence with essential procedures by the end of their training, residents need graded autonomy as they progress through training. This study compares autonomy expectations, as defined by faculty and residents, with autonomy measured in the operating room.

Methods Operative procedures performed by general surgery residents between November 2012 and June 2013 were each assigned an autonomy score by the operating attending physician using a previously described rating scale (Zwisch). Scores range from minimum autonomy, "show and tell," to maximum autonomy, "supervision only." Autonomy expectations were defined by a survey asking faculty and residents what autonomy-level residents should achieve during each year of training for each of the 10 most commonly performed procedures. Faculty expectations, resident expectations, and actual operating room autonomy data were compared using analysis of variance with post hoc analysis by Tukey honestly significant difference test.

Results A total of 1467 operative cases were scored using the Zwisch scale over the period of the study. The 10 most common procedures accounted for 56.3% (827) of the cases. Resident and faculty expectations of resident operative autonomy were similar. For only laparoscopic cholecystectomy, residents expected significantly more autonomy than the faculty did during the junior years but they agreed with the faculty for the chief year. When expectations were compared with actual performance, the resident autonomy level achieved was significantly less than that expected by residents or faculty or both for all 10 procedures in at least one postgraduate level. For every procedure performed more than 5 times during the study period by postgraduate years 3 to 5 residents, autonomy was significantly less than expected.

Conclusions Surgical faculty and residents had similar expectations for resident operative autonomy, yet actual resident performance failed to achieve those shared expectations for even the most common procedures. This autonomy gap provides more evidence for concerns about the preparedness of graduating residents for independent practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e64-e72
JournalJournal of Surgical Education
Volume71
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2014

Fingerprint

Operating Rooms
autonomy
resident
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
Operative Surgical Procedures
Analysis of Variance
Physicians
rating scale
analysis of variance
surgery
performance
supervision

Keywords

  • autonomy
  • graduate medical education
  • perform- ance
  • surgery

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Education
  • Medicine(all)

Cite this

@article{a058dfcef38642f2b13e0e181e2178f1,
title = "Defining the autonomy gap: When expectations do not meet reality in the operating room",
abstract = "Objective To develop operative independence with essential procedures by the end of their training, residents need graded autonomy as they progress through training. This study compares autonomy expectations, as defined by faculty and residents, with autonomy measured in the operating room.Methods Operative procedures performed by general surgery residents between November 2012 and June 2013 were each assigned an autonomy score by the operating attending physician using a previously described rating scale (Zwisch). Scores range from minimum autonomy, {"}show and tell,{"} to maximum autonomy, {"}supervision only.{"} Autonomy expectations were defined by a survey asking faculty and residents what autonomy-level residents should achieve during each year of training for each of the 10 most commonly performed procedures. Faculty expectations, resident expectations, and actual operating room autonomy data were compared using analysis of variance with post hoc analysis by Tukey honestly significant difference test.Results A total of 1467 operative cases were scored using the Zwisch scale over the period of the study. The 10 most common procedures accounted for 56.3{\%} (827) of the cases. Resident and faculty expectations of resident operative autonomy were similar. For only laparoscopic cholecystectomy, residents expected significantly more autonomy than the faculty did during the junior years but they agreed with the faculty for the chief year. When expectations were compared with actual performance, the resident autonomy level achieved was significantly less than that expected by residents or faculty or both for all 10 procedures in at least one postgraduate level. For every procedure performed more than 5 times during the study period by postgraduate years 3 to 5 residents, autonomy was significantly less than expected.Conclusions Surgical faculty and residents had similar expectations for resident operative autonomy, yet actual resident performance failed to achieve those shared expectations for even the most common procedures. This autonomy gap provides more evidence for concerns about the preparedness of graduating residents for independent practice.",
keywords = "autonomy, graduate medical education, perform- ance, surgery",
author = "Meyerson, {Shari Lynn} and Teitelbaum, {Ezra Nathaniel} and George, {Brian C.} and Schuller, {Mary C.} and Debra DaRosa and Fryer, {Jonathan Paul}",
year = "2014",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.05.002",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "71",
pages = "e64--e72",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Education",
issn = "1931-7204",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "6",

}

Defining the autonomy gap : When expectations do not meet reality in the operating room. / Meyerson, Shari Lynn; Teitelbaum, Ezra Nathaniel; George, Brian C.; Schuller, Mary C.; DaRosa, Debra; Fryer, Jonathan Paul.

In: Journal of Surgical Education, Vol. 71, No. 6, 01.01.2014, p. e64-e72.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining the autonomy gap

T2 - When expectations do not meet reality in the operating room

AU - Meyerson, Shari Lynn

AU - Teitelbaum, Ezra Nathaniel

AU - George, Brian C.

AU - Schuller, Mary C.

AU - DaRosa, Debra

AU - Fryer, Jonathan Paul

PY - 2014/1/1

Y1 - 2014/1/1

N2 - Objective To develop operative independence with essential procedures by the end of their training, residents need graded autonomy as they progress through training. This study compares autonomy expectations, as defined by faculty and residents, with autonomy measured in the operating room.Methods Operative procedures performed by general surgery residents between November 2012 and June 2013 were each assigned an autonomy score by the operating attending physician using a previously described rating scale (Zwisch). Scores range from minimum autonomy, "show and tell," to maximum autonomy, "supervision only." Autonomy expectations were defined by a survey asking faculty and residents what autonomy-level residents should achieve during each year of training for each of the 10 most commonly performed procedures. Faculty expectations, resident expectations, and actual operating room autonomy data were compared using analysis of variance with post hoc analysis by Tukey honestly significant difference test.Results A total of 1467 operative cases were scored using the Zwisch scale over the period of the study. The 10 most common procedures accounted for 56.3% (827) of the cases. Resident and faculty expectations of resident operative autonomy were similar. For only laparoscopic cholecystectomy, residents expected significantly more autonomy than the faculty did during the junior years but they agreed with the faculty for the chief year. When expectations were compared with actual performance, the resident autonomy level achieved was significantly less than that expected by residents or faculty or both for all 10 procedures in at least one postgraduate level. For every procedure performed more than 5 times during the study period by postgraduate years 3 to 5 residents, autonomy was significantly less than expected.Conclusions Surgical faculty and residents had similar expectations for resident operative autonomy, yet actual resident performance failed to achieve those shared expectations for even the most common procedures. This autonomy gap provides more evidence for concerns about the preparedness of graduating residents for independent practice.

AB - Objective To develop operative independence with essential procedures by the end of their training, residents need graded autonomy as they progress through training. This study compares autonomy expectations, as defined by faculty and residents, with autonomy measured in the operating room.Methods Operative procedures performed by general surgery residents between November 2012 and June 2013 were each assigned an autonomy score by the operating attending physician using a previously described rating scale (Zwisch). Scores range from minimum autonomy, "show and tell," to maximum autonomy, "supervision only." Autonomy expectations were defined by a survey asking faculty and residents what autonomy-level residents should achieve during each year of training for each of the 10 most commonly performed procedures. Faculty expectations, resident expectations, and actual operating room autonomy data were compared using analysis of variance with post hoc analysis by Tukey honestly significant difference test.Results A total of 1467 operative cases were scored using the Zwisch scale over the period of the study. The 10 most common procedures accounted for 56.3% (827) of the cases. Resident and faculty expectations of resident operative autonomy were similar. For only laparoscopic cholecystectomy, residents expected significantly more autonomy than the faculty did during the junior years but they agreed with the faculty for the chief year. When expectations were compared with actual performance, the resident autonomy level achieved was significantly less than that expected by residents or faculty or both for all 10 procedures in at least one postgraduate level. For every procedure performed more than 5 times during the study period by postgraduate years 3 to 5 residents, autonomy was significantly less than expected.Conclusions Surgical faculty and residents had similar expectations for resident operative autonomy, yet actual resident performance failed to achieve those shared expectations for even the most common procedures. This autonomy gap provides more evidence for concerns about the preparedness of graduating residents for independent practice.

KW - autonomy

KW - graduate medical education

KW - perform- ance

KW - surgery

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84920150036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84920150036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.05.002

DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2014.05.002

M3 - Article

VL - 71

SP - e64-e72

JO - Journal of Surgical Education

JF - Journal of Surgical Education

SN - 1931-7204

IS - 6

ER -