Defining the Content for a Quality and Safety in Surgery Curriculum Using a Nominal Group Technique

Rachel R. Kelz*, Morgan M. Sellers, Ryan Patrick Merkow, Rajesh Aggarwal, Clifford Y. Ko

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Objective: There is growing awareness of the need to provide surgical residents with training in quality and safety. Previous studies have revealed a need for a formal curriculum, but the content and structure of such a curriculum has not been defined. Our objective was to develop a surgery resident curriculum using a consensus, team-building approach. Design: This study consisted of moderated, structured focus groups using a nominal group technique to guide discussion. Participants generated rank lists of topics to be included and answered questions regarding structure and design of teaching and assessment modalities. SETTING: Two separate focus groups among 9 surgical residents and 10 faculty experts in quality and safety were held in conjunction with the American College of Surgeons Quality and Safety Conference in July 2017. A total of 16 institutions were represented. RESULTS: A total of 35 topics were initially proposed by the resident group and a total of 41 topics were proposed by the expert group. After discussion, each group reached consensus on a final list of 9 topics. Most topics in the final lists fell into the broad areas of improvement science and nontechnical skills. Residents indicated that most topics were, on average, poorly covered by their current training program, however, a wide range was noted within each topic. Faculty indicated a preference for didactic instructional methods and assessment using multiple-choice questions. CONCLUSIONS: Quality and safety are integral components of surgical training. Learners and experts agreed that topics within the domains of improvement science and nontechnical skills should be included in a formal curriculum. Learners reported wide variation on how well these topics are currently included in graduate medical education training programs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)795-801
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Surgical Education
Volume76
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2019

Fingerprint

Curriculum
surgery
resident
Safety
curriculum
Focus Groups
expert
Group
training program
Graduate Medical Education
Education
Teaching
science
didactics
group discussion
graduate
education

Keywords

  • ACS, American College of Surgeons
  • CLER, Clinical Learning Environment Review
  • GME, graduate medical education
  • General surgery
  • Graduate medical education
  • NGT, nominal group technique
  • NSQIP, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
  • Patient safety
  • Practice-Based Learning and Improvement
  • QITI, Quality In Training Initiative
  • QS, quality and safety
  • Quality improvement
  • Systems-Based Practice

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Education

Cite this

Kelz, Rachel R. ; Sellers, Morgan M. ; Merkow, Ryan Patrick ; Aggarwal, Rajesh ; Ko, Clifford Y. / Defining the Content for a Quality and Safety in Surgery Curriculum Using a Nominal Group Technique. In: Journal of Surgical Education. 2019 ; Vol. 76, No. 3. pp. 795-801.
@article{348cf22b6ba84da78f92f73b6006150f,
title = "Defining the Content for a Quality and Safety in Surgery Curriculum Using a Nominal Group Technique",
abstract = "Objective: There is growing awareness of the need to provide surgical residents with training in quality and safety. Previous studies have revealed a need for a formal curriculum, but the content and structure of such a curriculum has not been defined. Our objective was to develop a surgery resident curriculum using a consensus, team-building approach. Design: This study consisted of moderated, structured focus groups using a nominal group technique to guide discussion. Participants generated rank lists of topics to be included and answered questions regarding structure and design of teaching and assessment modalities. SETTING: Two separate focus groups among 9 surgical residents and 10 faculty experts in quality and safety were held in conjunction with the American College of Surgeons Quality and Safety Conference in July 2017. A total of 16 institutions were represented. RESULTS: A total of 35 topics were initially proposed by the resident group and a total of 41 topics were proposed by the expert group. After discussion, each group reached consensus on a final list of 9 topics. Most topics in the final lists fell into the broad areas of improvement science and nontechnical skills. Residents indicated that most topics were, on average, poorly covered by their current training program, however, a wide range was noted within each topic. Faculty indicated a preference for didactic instructional methods and assessment using multiple-choice questions. CONCLUSIONS: Quality and safety are integral components of surgical training. Learners and experts agreed that topics within the domains of improvement science and nontechnical skills should be included in a formal curriculum. Learners reported wide variation on how well these topics are currently included in graduate medical education training programs.",
keywords = "ACS, American College of Surgeons, CLER, Clinical Learning Environment Review, GME, graduate medical education, General surgery, Graduate medical education, NGT, nominal group technique, NSQIP, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, Patient safety, Practice-Based Learning and Improvement, QITI, Quality In Training Initiative, QS, quality and safety, Quality improvement, Systems-Based Practice",
author = "Kelz, {Rachel R.} and Sellers, {Morgan M.} and Merkow, {Ryan Patrick} and Rajesh Aggarwal and Ko, {Clifford Y.}",
year = "2019",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "76",
pages = "795--801",
journal = "Journal of Surgical Education",
issn = "1931-7204",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Defining the Content for a Quality and Safety in Surgery Curriculum Using a Nominal Group Technique. / Kelz, Rachel R.; Sellers, Morgan M.; Merkow, Ryan Patrick; Aggarwal, Rajesh; Ko, Clifford Y.

In: Journal of Surgical Education, Vol. 76, No. 3, 01.05.2019, p. 795-801.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Defining the Content for a Quality and Safety in Surgery Curriculum Using a Nominal Group Technique

AU - Kelz, Rachel R.

AU - Sellers, Morgan M.

AU - Merkow, Ryan Patrick

AU - Aggarwal, Rajesh

AU - Ko, Clifford Y.

PY - 2019/5/1

Y1 - 2019/5/1

N2 - Objective: There is growing awareness of the need to provide surgical residents with training in quality and safety. Previous studies have revealed a need for a formal curriculum, but the content and structure of such a curriculum has not been defined. Our objective was to develop a surgery resident curriculum using a consensus, team-building approach. Design: This study consisted of moderated, structured focus groups using a nominal group technique to guide discussion. Participants generated rank lists of topics to be included and answered questions regarding structure and design of teaching and assessment modalities. SETTING: Two separate focus groups among 9 surgical residents and 10 faculty experts in quality and safety were held in conjunction with the American College of Surgeons Quality and Safety Conference in July 2017. A total of 16 institutions were represented. RESULTS: A total of 35 topics were initially proposed by the resident group and a total of 41 topics were proposed by the expert group. After discussion, each group reached consensus on a final list of 9 topics. Most topics in the final lists fell into the broad areas of improvement science and nontechnical skills. Residents indicated that most topics were, on average, poorly covered by their current training program, however, a wide range was noted within each topic. Faculty indicated a preference for didactic instructional methods and assessment using multiple-choice questions. CONCLUSIONS: Quality and safety are integral components of surgical training. Learners and experts agreed that topics within the domains of improvement science and nontechnical skills should be included in a formal curriculum. Learners reported wide variation on how well these topics are currently included in graduate medical education training programs.

AB - Objective: There is growing awareness of the need to provide surgical residents with training in quality and safety. Previous studies have revealed a need for a formal curriculum, but the content and structure of such a curriculum has not been defined. Our objective was to develop a surgery resident curriculum using a consensus, team-building approach. Design: This study consisted of moderated, structured focus groups using a nominal group technique to guide discussion. Participants generated rank lists of topics to be included and answered questions regarding structure and design of teaching and assessment modalities. SETTING: Two separate focus groups among 9 surgical residents and 10 faculty experts in quality and safety were held in conjunction with the American College of Surgeons Quality and Safety Conference in July 2017. A total of 16 institutions were represented. RESULTS: A total of 35 topics were initially proposed by the resident group and a total of 41 topics were proposed by the expert group. After discussion, each group reached consensus on a final list of 9 topics. Most topics in the final lists fell into the broad areas of improvement science and nontechnical skills. Residents indicated that most topics were, on average, poorly covered by their current training program, however, a wide range was noted within each topic. Faculty indicated a preference for didactic instructional methods and assessment using multiple-choice questions. CONCLUSIONS: Quality and safety are integral components of surgical training. Learners and experts agreed that topics within the domains of improvement science and nontechnical skills should be included in a formal curriculum. Learners reported wide variation on how well these topics are currently included in graduate medical education training programs.

KW - ACS, American College of Surgeons

KW - CLER, Clinical Learning Environment Review

KW - GME, graduate medical education

KW - General surgery

KW - Graduate medical education

KW - NGT, nominal group technique

KW - NSQIP, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program

KW - Patient safety

KW - Practice-Based Learning and Improvement

KW - QITI, Quality In Training Initiative

KW - QS, quality and safety

KW - Quality improvement

KW - Systems-Based Practice

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85056728418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85056728418&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.10.005

M3 - Article

C2 - 30466885

AN - SCOPUS:85056728418

VL - 76

SP - 795

EP - 801

JO - Journal of Surgical Education

JF - Journal of Surgical Education

SN - 1931-7204

IS - 3

ER -