Delaware's balancing act

John Armour*, Bernard Black, Brian Cheffins

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

Delaware's courts and well-developed case law are widely seen as integral elements of Delaware's success in attracting incorporations. However, as we show using empirical evidence involving reported judicial decisions and filed cases concerning large mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, and options backdating, Delaware's popularity as a venue for corporate litigation is under threat. Today, a majority of shareholder suits involving Delaware companies are being brought and decided elsewhere. We examine in this Article the implications of this "out-of-Delaware" trend, emphasizing a difficult balancing act that Delaware faces. If Delaware accommodates litigation too readily, companies, fearful of lawsuits, may incorporate elsewhere. But if plaintiffs' attorneys find the Delaware courts unwelcoming, they can often file cases in other courts. Delaware could risk losing its status as the de facto national corporate law court, as well as the case flow that lets it provide the rich body of precedent that is part of Delaware's overall corporate law "brand." We assess how the Delaware courts and legislature, and Delaware companies, might respond to this threat to Delaware's pre-eminence as the leading forum for corporate cases, as well as incorporations.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1345-1405
Number of pages61
JournalIndiana Law Journal
Volume87
Issue number4
StatePublished - Sep 1 2012

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Law

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Delaware's balancing act'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Armour, J., Black, B., & Cheffins, B. (2012). Delaware's balancing act. Indiana Law Journal, 87(4), 1345-1405.