Abstract
Objectives: The Society of Critical Care Medicine recommends routine delirium monitoring, based on data in critically ill patients without primary neurologic injury. We sought to answer whether there are valid and reliable tools to monitor delirium in neurocritically ill patients and whether delirium is associated with relevant clinical outcomes (e.g., survival, length of stay, functional independence, cognition) in this population. Data Sources: We systematically reviewed Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Web of Science, and PubMed. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Inclusion criteria allowed any study design investigating delirium monitoring in neurocritically ill patients (e.g., neurotrauma, ischemic, and/or hemorrhagic stroke) of any age. We extracted data relevant to delirium tool sensitivity, specifcity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, interrater reliability, and associated clinical outcomes. Data Synthesis: Among seven prospective cohort studies and a total of 1,173 patients, delirium was assessed in neurocritically patients using validated delirium tools after considering primary neurologic diagnoses and associated complications, fnding a pooled prevalence rate of 12-43%. When able to compare against a common reference standard, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, the test characteristics showed a sensitivity of 62-76%, specifcity of 74-98%, positive predictive value of 63-91%, negative predictive value of 70-94%, and reliability kappa of 0.64-0.94. Among four studies reporting multivariable analyses, delirium in neurocritically patients was associated with increased hospital length of stay (n = 3) and ICU length of stay (n = 1), as well as worse functional independence (n = 1) and cognition (n = 2), but not survival.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1832-1841 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Critical care medicine |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2018 |
Funding
Supported, in part, by Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (Nashville, TN) and the National Institutes of Health AG027472, AG035117, HL111111, GM120484 (Bethesda, MD). Dr. Patel’s institution received funding from National Institutes of Health (NIH) HL111111 and NIH GM120484; he received funding from Pfizer/ Hospira (education presentation); and he disclosed that funding was provided by federal sources including the Veterans Affairs (VA) Tennessee Valley Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center (Nashville, TN) and the NIH AG027472, AG035117, HL111111, GM120484 (Bethesda, MD). Drs. Patel and Ely received support for article research from the NIH. Ms. Klein’s institution received funding from Hill Rom Co. Dr. Naid-ech received support for article research from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K18 HS023437). Dr. Pun received funding from the Society of Critical Care Medicine, the American Association of Critical Care Medicine, and the France Foundation to provide continuing education. Dr. John disclosed other support from CSL Behring (speaker). Dr. Pandharipande’s institution received funding from Hospira. Dr. Ely’s institution received funding from NIH and VA funding, and he received funding from Orion Laboratories, Abbott Laboratories, and Pfizer. Dr. Pandhari-pande has received a research grant from Hospira Inc, in collaboration with the NIH. Dr. Ely has conducted Continuing Medical Education activities sponsored by Abbott, Hospira, and Orion. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest. For information regarding this article, E-mail: [email protected]
Keywords
- Delirium
- Intensive care unit
- Neurocritical care
- Neurotrauma
- Stroke
- Traumatic brain injury
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine