Democratic Theory, the Boundary Problem, and Global Reform

Shmuel Nili*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

One of the enduring problems in democratic theory is its inability to specify who should belong to the demos. In recent years, several scholars have been arguing that democratic theory should try to overcome this boundary problem through different kinds of global reform. I argue, however, that the boundary problem is an analytical distraction in thinking about global reform. I begin with general doubts as to whether the boundary problem can ground global reform. I then join the developing conversation on Arash Abizadeh's and Robert Goodin's boundary problem arguments. I offer new reasons for why both arguments encounter fundamental difficulties. I conclude by anticipating the concern that my argument does not take the need for global reform seriously enough.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)99-123
Number of pages25
JournalReview of Politics
Volume79
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Democratic Theory, the Boundary Problem, and Global Reform'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this