TY - GEN
T1 - Demonstrating the benefits of source-mask optimization and enabling technologies through experiment and simulations
AU - Melville, David
AU - Rosenbluth, Alan E.
AU - Tian, Kehan
AU - Lai, Kafai
AU - Bagheri, Saeed
AU - Tirapu-Azpiroz, Jaione
AU - Meiring, Jason
AU - Halle, Scott
AU - McIntyre, Greg
AU - Faure, Tom
AU - Corliss, Daniel
AU - Krasnoperova, Azalia
AU - Zhuang, Lei
AU - Strenski, Phil
AU - Waechter, Andreas
AU - Ladanyi, Laszlo
AU - Barahona, Francisco
AU - Scarpazza, Daniele
AU - Lee, Jon
AU - Inoue, Tadanobu
AU - Sakamoto, Masaharu
AU - Muta, Hidemasa
AU - Wagner, Alfred
AU - Burr, Geoffrey
AU - Kim, Young
AU - Gallagher, Emily
AU - Hibbs, Mike
AU - Tritchkov, Alexander
AU - Granik, Yuri
AU - Fakhry, Moutaz
AU - Adam, Kostas
AU - Berger, Gabriel
AU - Lam, Michael
AU - Dave, Aasutosh
AU - Cobb, Nick
PY - 2010
Y1 - 2010
N2 - In recent years the potential of Source-Mask Optimization (SMO) as an enabling technology for 22nm-and-beyond lithography has been explored and documented in the literature.1-5 It has been shown that intensive optimization of the fundamental degrees of freedom in the optical system allows for the creation of non-intuitive solutions in both the mask and the source, which leads to improved lithographic performance. These efforts have driven the need for improved controllability in illumination5-7 and have pushed the required optimization performance of mask design.8, 9This paper will present recent experimental evidence of the performance advantage gained by intensive optimization, and enabling technologies like pixelated illumination. Controllable pixelated illumination opens up new regimes in control of proximity effects,1, 6, 7 and we will show corresponding examples of improved through-pitch performance in 22nm Resolution Enhancement Technique (RET). Simulation results will back-up the experimental results and detail the ability of SMO to drive exposure-count reduction, as well as a reduction in process variation due to critical factors such as Line Edge Roughness (LER), Mask Error Enhancement Factor (MEEF), and the Electromagnetic Field (EMF) effect. The benefits of running intensive optimization with both source and mask variables jointly has been previously discussed.1-3 This paper will build on these results by demonstrating large-scale jointly-optimized source/mask solutions and their impact on design-rule enumerated designs.
AB - In recent years the potential of Source-Mask Optimization (SMO) as an enabling technology for 22nm-and-beyond lithography has been explored and documented in the literature.1-5 It has been shown that intensive optimization of the fundamental degrees of freedom in the optical system allows for the creation of non-intuitive solutions in both the mask and the source, which leads to improved lithographic performance. These efforts have driven the need for improved controllability in illumination5-7 and have pushed the required optimization performance of mask design.8, 9This paper will present recent experimental evidence of the performance advantage gained by intensive optimization, and enabling technologies like pixelated illumination. Controllable pixelated illumination opens up new regimes in control of proximity effects,1, 6, 7 and we will show corresponding examples of improved through-pitch performance in 22nm Resolution Enhancement Technique (RET). Simulation results will back-up the experimental results and detail the ability of SMO to drive exposure-count reduction, as well as a reduction in process variation due to critical factors such as Line Edge Roughness (LER), Mask Error Enhancement Factor (MEEF), and the Electromagnetic Field (EMF) effect. The benefits of running intensive optimization with both source and mask variables jointly has been previously discussed.1-3 This paper will build on these results by demonstrating large-scale jointly-optimized source/mask solutions and their impact on design-rule enumerated designs.
KW - Mask Optimization
KW - OPC
KW - RET
KW - SMO
KW - Source Optimization
KW - Source-Mask Optimization
KW - global optimization
KW - linear program
KW - off-axis illumination
KW - optical proximity correction
KW - pixelated illumination
KW - programmable illumination reticle enhancement technology
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=78649888825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=78649888825&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1117/12.846716
DO - 10.1117/12.846716
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:78649888825
SN - 9780819480545
T3 - Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering
BT - Optical Microlithography XXIII
PB - SPIE
T2 - Optical Microlithography XXIII
Y2 - 23 February 2010 through 25 February 2010
ER -