TY - JOUR
T1 - Depression Identified on the Mental Component Score of the Short Form-12 Affects Health Related Quality of Life after Lumbar Decompression Surgery
AU - Divi, Srikanth N.
AU - Goyal, Dhruv K.C.
AU - Stull, Justin D.
AU - Morgenstern, Monica
AU - Galetta, Matthew S.
AU - Kaye, I. David
AU - Kurd, Mark F.
AU - Woods, Barrett I.
AU - Radcliff, Kris E.
AU - Rihn, Jeffery A.
AU - Anderson, David Greg
AU - Hilibrand, Alan S.
AU - Kepler, Christopher K.
AU - Vaccaro, Alexander R.
AU - Schroeder, Gregory D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/4
Y1 - 2021/4
N2 - Study Design: This was a retrospective comparative study. Objective: The goal of this study was to further elucidate the relationship between preoperative depression and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) following lumbar decompression surgery. Summary of Background Data: The impact of preoperative depression on PROMs after lumbar decompression surgery is not well established. Methods: Patients undergoing lumbar decompression between 1 and 3 levels were retrospectively identified. Patients were split into 2 groups using a preoperative Mental Component Score (MCS)-12 threshold score of 45.6 or 35.0 to identify those with and without depressive symptoms. In addition, patients were also split based on a pre-existing diagnosis of depression in the medical chart. Absolute PROM scores, the recovery ratio and the percent of patients achieving minimum clinically important difference between groups were compared, and a multiple linear regression analysis was performed. Results: A total of 184 patients were included, with 125 (67.9%) in the MCS-12 >45.6 group and 59 (32.1%) in the MCS-12 =45.6 group. The MCS-12 =45.6 and MCS<35.0 group had worse baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (P<0.001 for both) and Visual Analogue Scale Leg (P=0.018 and 0.024, respectively) scores. The MCS =45.6 group had greater disability postoperatively in terms of SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS-12) (39.1 vs. 43.1, P=0.015) and ODI (26.6 vs. 17.8, P=0.006). Using regression analysis, having a baseline MCS-12 scores =45.6 before surgical intervention was a significant predictor of worse improvement in terms of PCS-12 [ß=-4.548 (-7.567 to -1.530), P=0.003] and ODI [ß=8.234 (1.433, 15.035), P=0.010] scores than the MCS-12 >45.6 group. Conclusion: Although all patients showed improved in all PROMs after surgery, those with MCS-12 =45.6 showed less improvement in PCS-12 and ODI scores.
AB - Study Design: This was a retrospective comparative study. Objective: The goal of this study was to further elucidate the relationship between preoperative depression and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) following lumbar decompression surgery. Summary of Background Data: The impact of preoperative depression on PROMs after lumbar decompression surgery is not well established. Methods: Patients undergoing lumbar decompression between 1 and 3 levels were retrospectively identified. Patients were split into 2 groups using a preoperative Mental Component Score (MCS)-12 threshold score of 45.6 or 35.0 to identify those with and without depressive symptoms. In addition, patients were also split based on a pre-existing diagnosis of depression in the medical chart. Absolute PROM scores, the recovery ratio and the percent of patients achieving minimum clinically important difference between groups were compared, and a multiple linear regression analysis was performed. Results: A total of 184 patients were included, with 125 (67.9%) in the MCS-12 >45.6 group and 59 (32.1%) in the MCS-12 =45.6 group. The MCS-12 =45.6 and MCS<35.0 group had worse baseline Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) (P<0.001 for both) and Visual Analogue Scale Leg (P=0.018 and 0.024, respectively) scores. The MCS =45.6 group had greater disability postoperatively in terms of SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS-12) (39.1 vs. 43.1, P=0.015) and ODI (26.6 vs. 17.8, P=0.006). Using regression analysis, having a baseline MCS-12 scores =45.6 before surgical intervention was a significant predictor of worse improvement in terms of PCS-12 [ß=-4.548 (-7.567 to -1.530), P=0.003] and ODI [ß=8.234 (1.433, 15.035), P=0.010] scores than the MCS-12 >45.6 group. Conclusion: Although all patients showed improved in all PROMs after surgery, those with MCS-12 =45.6 showed less improvement in PCS-12 and ODI scores.
KW - Oswestry Disability Index
KW - SF-12 Mental Component Score
KW - SF-12 Physical Component Score
KW - Visual Analogue Scale Back pain
KW - Visual Analogue Scale Leg pain
KW - depression
KW - lumbar decompression
KW - patient-reported outcome measurements
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103473343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85103473343&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001064
DO - 10.1097/BSD.0000000000001064
M3 - Article
C2 - 32889958
AN - SCOPUS:85103473343
SN - 2380-0186
VL - 34
SP - E126-E132
JO - Clinical spine surgery
JF - Clinical spine surgery
IS - 3
ER -