TY - JOUR
T1 - Design and initial enrollment in the Vascular Physicians Offer and Report (VAPOR) trial
AU - VAPOR Trial Investigators
AU - Spangler, Emily L.
AU - Brooke, Benjamin S.
AU - Beck, Adam W.
AU - Hoel, Andrew
AU - Farber, Alik
AU - Goodney, Philip P.
AU - Tan, Tze Woei
AU - Schanzer, Andres
AU - Hallett, John
N1 - Funding Information:
We acknowledge Dr Andres Schanzer, Dr Tze-Woei Tan, and Dr John “Jeb” Hallett, for their contributions as site principal investigators in the VAPOR trial, the study site coordinators, Julie Beckstrom, Maria Maloney, Natali Rutiaga, Shannon Jobron, Kendra Olivieri, Brianna Moran, Mollynda McArthur, and Yuming Lin, and the central study coordinator Raquel Chase-Kelly. Finally, we are grateful for the support of the Society for Vascular Surgery Foundation for supporting this pilot trial.
Funding Information:
This study was funded by a Multicenter Clinical Trials Pilot grant from the Society for Vascular Surgery .
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Society for Vascular Surgery.
PY - 2016/4/1
Y1 - 2016/4/1
N2 - Although patient smoking cessation is a key priority for vascular surgeons, significant variation exists in the manner in which vascular surgeons address this key process of care. We describe a multicenter, cluster-randomized trial that compares a standardized, brief smoking cessation intervention to usual care for patients facing vascular surgery or endovascular interventions. Eight centers were randomized to provide usual care for smoking cessation or a standardized protocol consisting of (1) physician "very brief advice" to stop smoking, (2) offering nicotine replacement therapy, and (3) referral to a phone-based counseling service. Trial enrollment began on September 1, 2014. At present, 142 patients had been enrolled in the trial across eight sites. Compared with patients in the usual care arm, patients enrolled in the smoking cessation intervention arm were more likely to receive physician advice (98% vs 77%), a prescription for nicotine replacement therapy (77% vs 13%), and quitline referral (93% vs 33%; all P <.001). Although final results of the intervention on smoking cessation rates are still forthcoming, surgeon delivery of a brief, evidence-based smoking cessation intervention appears feasible for patients facing invasive vascular care.
AB - Although patient smoking cessation is a key priority for vascular surgeons, significant variation exists in the manner in which vascular surgeons address this key process of care. We describe a multicenter, cluster-randomized trial that compares a standardized, brief smoking cessation intervention to usual care for patients facing vascular surgery or endovascular interventions. Eight centers were randomized to provide usual care for smoking cessation or a standardized protocol consisting of (1) physician "very brief advice" to stop smoking, (2) offering nicotine replacement therapy, and (3) referral to a phone-based counseling service. Trial enrollment began on September 1, 2014. At present, 142 patients had been enrolled in the trial across eight sites. Compared with patients in the usual care arm, patients enrolled in the smoking cessation intervention arm were more likely to receive physician advice (98% vs 77%), a prescription for nicotine replacement therapy (77% vs 13%), and quitline referral (93% vs 33%; all P <.001). Although final results of the intervention on smoking cessation rates are still forthcoming, surgeon delivery of a brief, evidence-based smoking cessation intervention appears feasible for patients facing invasive vascular care.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84962440847&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84962440847&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.026
DO - 10.1016/j.jvs.2015.12.026
M3 - Article
C2 - 27016862
AN - SCOPUS:84962440847
SN - 0741-5214
VL - 63
SP - 1121-1125.e2
JO - Journal of Vascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Vascular Surgery
IS - 4
ER -