Detectability of simultaneously masked signals as a function of masker bandwidth and configuration for different signal delays

Beverly A. Wright*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Scopus citations

Abstract

Signal detectability was measured in three temporal conditions as a function of the bandwidth and configuration of simultaneous maskers that either did or did not spectrally overlap the signal. The 20-ms signal was 250 Hz wide and was centered at 2500 Hz (f(s)). Although there were marked individual differences, performance was typically poorer when signal onset came 1 ms rather than 250 ms after the onset of a 420-ms masker, and poorest when signal onset came 1 ms after the onset of a 23-ms masker. The results support the idea that two separate across-channel processes contribute to temporal changes in signal detectability. One process contributes to the improvement observed as signal onset is delayed from masker onset, and its influence is reduced by the presence of masking components at f(s) only when the masker extends exclusively below f(s). The other process is associated with the improvement observed as masker offset is delayed from signal offset, and its influence is reduced by the presence of masking components at f(s) when the masker extends exclusively above, or both below and above f(s). Both of these processes are primarily activated by frequencies ranging from 0.6 to 0.8f(s) and 1.2 to 1.4f(s). The data also demonstrate that the measured critical bandwidth narrows as signal onset is delayed from masker onset.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)420-429
Number of pages10
Journaljournal of the Acoustical Society of America
Volume101
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1997

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous)
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Detectability of simultaneously masked signals as a function of masker bandwidth and configuration for different signal delays'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this