Determinants of evidence-based practice uptake in rural intensive care units a mixed methods study

Katherine R. Sterba*, Emily E. Johnson, Nandita Nadig, Annie N. Simpson, Kit N. Simpson, Andrew J. Goodwin, Rebecca Beeks, Emily H. Warr, Jane Zapka, Dee W. Ford

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rationale: Evidence-based practices promote quality care for intensive care unit patients but chronic evidence-to-practice gaps limit their reach. Objectives: To characterize key determinants of evidence-based practice uptake in the rural intensive care setting. Methods: A parallel convergent mixed methods design was used with six hospitals receiving a quality improvement intervention. Guided by implementation science principles, we identified barriers and facilitators to uptake using clinician surveys (N= 90), key informant interviews (N= 14), and an implementation tracking log. Uptake was defined as completion of eight practice change steps within 12 months. After completing qualitative and quantitative data analyses for each hospital, site, staff, and program delivery factors were summarized within and across hospitals to identify patterns by uptake status. Results: At the site level, although structural characteristics (hospital size, intensivist staffing) did not vary by uptake status, interviews highlighted variability in staffing patterns and culture that differed by uptake status. At the clinician team level, readiness and self-efficacy were consistently high across sites at baseline with time and financial resources endorsed as primary barriers. However, interviews highlighted that as initiatives progressed, differences across sites in attitudes and ownership of change were key uptake influences. At the program delivery level, mixed methods data highlighted program engagement and leadership variability by uptake status. Higher uptake sites had better training attendance; more program activities completed; and a stable, engaged, collaborative nurse and physician champion team. Conclusions: Results provide an understanding of the multiple dynamic influences on different patterns of evidencebased practice uptake and the importance of implementation support strategies to accelerate uptake in the intensive care setting.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1104-1116
Number of pages13
JournalAnnals of the American Thoracic Society
Volume17
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Critical care
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Implementation science
  • Intensive care
  • Mixed methods

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Determinants of evidence-based practice uptake in rural intensive care units a mixed methods study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this