Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS® Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0

Kevin P. Weinfurt, Li Lin, Deborah Watkins Bruner, Jill M. Cyranowski, Carrie B. Dombeck, Elizabeth A Hahn, Diana D. Jeffery, Richard M. Luecht, Susan Magasi, Laura S. Porter, Jennifer Barsky Reese, Bryce B. Reeve, Rebecca A. Shelby, Ashley Wilder Smith, John T. Willse, Kathryn E. Flynn

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Introduction: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)® Sexual Function and Satisfaction measure (SexFS) version 1.0 was developed with cancer populations. There is a need to expand the SexFS and provide evidence of its validity in diverse populations. Aim: The aim of this study was to describe the development of the SexFS v2.0 and present preliminary evidence for its validity. Methods: Development built on version 1.0, plus additional review of extant items, discussions with 15 clinical experts, 11 patient focus groups (including individuals with diabetes, heart disease, anxiety, depression, and/or are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or aged 65 or older), 48 cognitive interviews, and psychometric evaluation in a random sample of U.S. adults plus an oversample for specific sexual problems (2281 men, 1686 women). We examined differential item functioning (DIF) by gender and sexual activity. We examined convergent and known-groups validity. Results: The final set of domains includes 11 scored scales (interest in sexual activity, lubrication, vaginal discomfort, clitoral discomfort, labial discomfort, erectile function, orgasm ability, orgasm pleasure, oral dryness, oral discomfort, satisfaction), and six nonscored item pools (screeners, sexual activities, anal discomfort, therapeutic aids, factors interfering with sexual satisfaction, bother). Domains from version 1.0 were reevaluated and improved. Domains considered applicable across gender and sexual activity status, namely interest, orgasm, and satisfaction, were found to have significant DIF. We identified subsets of items in each domain that provided consistent measurement across these important respondent groups. Convergent and known-groups validity was supported. Conclusions: The SexFS version 2.0 has several improvements and enhancements over version 1.0 and other extant measures, including expanded evidence for validity, scores centered around norms for sexually active U.S. adults, new domains, and a final set of items applicable for both men and women and those sexually active with a partner and without. The SexFS is customizable, allowing users to select relevant domains and items for their study. Weinfurt KP, Lin L, Bruner DW, Cyranowski JM, Dombeck CB, Hahn EA, Jeffery DD, Luecht RM, Magasi S, Porter LS, Reese JB, Reeve BB, Shelby RA, Smith AW, Willse JT, and Flynn KE. Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS® Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0. J Sex Med 2015;12:1961-1974.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1961-1974
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Sexual Medicine
Volume12
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2015

Fingerprint

Orgasm
Information Systems
Sexual Behavior
Patient Reported Outcome Measures
Lubrication
Xerostomia
Aptitude
Pleasure
Lip
Focus Groups
Psychometrics
Population
Heart Diseases
Anxiety
Interviews
Depression

Keywords

  • Patient-Reported outcome measures
  • Quality of life
  • Sexual function

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Reproductive Medicine
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Urology

Cite this

Weinfurt, K. P., Lin, L., Bruner, D. W., Cyranowski, J. M., Dombeck, C. B., Hahn, E. A., ... Flynn, K. E. (2015). Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS® Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0. Journal of Sexual Medicine, 12(9), 1961-1974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12966
Weinfurt, Kevin P. ; Lin, Li ; Bruner, Deborah Watkins ; Cyranowski, Jill M. ; Dombeck, Carrie B. ; Hahn, Elizabeth A ; Jeffery, Diana D. ; Luecht, Richard M. ; Magasi, Susan ; Porter, Laura S. ; Reese, Jennifer Barsky ; Reeve, Bryce B. ; Shelby, Rebecca A. ; Smith, Ashley Wilder ; Willse, John T. ; Flynn, Kathryn E. / Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS® Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0. In: Journal of Sexual Medicine. 2015 ; Vol. 12, No. 9. pp. 1961-1974.
@article{95124806c0494235999866e6a90496a4,
title = "Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS{\circledR} Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0",
abstract = "Introduction: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS){\circledR} Sexual Function and Satisfaction measure (SexFS) version 1.0 was developed with cancer populations. There is a need to expand the SexFS and provide evidence of its validity in diverse populations. Aim: The aim of this study was to describe the development of the SexFS v2.0 and present preliminary evidence for its validity. Methods: Development built on version 1.0, plus additional review of extant items, discussions with 15 clinical experts, 11 patient focus groups (including individuals with diabetes, heart disease, anxiety, depression, and/or are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or aged 65 or older), 48 cognitive interviews, and psychometric evaluation in a random sample of U.S. adults plus an oversample for specific sexual problems (2281 men, 1686 women). We examined differential item functioning (DIF) by gender and sexual activity. We examined convergent and known-groups validity. Results: The final set of domains includes 11 scored scales (interest in sexual activity, lubrication, vaginal discomfort, clitoral discomfort, labial discomfort, erectile function, orgasm ability, orgasm pleasure, oral dryness, oral discomfort, satisfaction), and six nonscored item pools (screeners, sexual activities, anal discomfort, therapeutic aids, factors interfering with sexual satisfaction, bother). Domains from version 1.0 were reevaluated and improved. Domains considered applicable across gender and sexual activity status, namely interest, orgasm, and satisfaction, were found to have significant DIF. We identified subsets of items in each domain that provided consistent measurement across these important respondent groups. Convergent and known-groups validity was supported. Conclusions: The SexFS version 2.0 has several improvements and enhancements over version 1.0 and other extant measures, including expanded evidence for validity, scores centered around norms for sexually active U.S. adults, new domains, and a final set of items applicable for both men and women and those sexually active with a partner and without. The SexFS is customizable, allowing users to select relevant domains and items for their study. Weinfurt KP, Lin L, Bruner DW, Cyranowski JM, Dombeck CB, Hahn EA, Jeffery DD, Luecht RM, Magasi S, Porter LS, Reese JB, Reeve BB, Shelby RA, Smith AW, Willse JT, and Flynn KE. Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS{\circledR} Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0. J Sex Med 2015;12:1961-1974.",
keywords = "Patient-Reported outcome measures, Quality of life, Sexual function",
author = "Weinfurt, {Kevin P.} and Li Lin and Bruner, {Deborah Watkins} and Cyranowski, {Jill M.} and Dombeck, {Carrie B.} and Hahn, {Elizabeth A} and Jeffery, {Diana D.} and Luecht, {Richard M.} and Susan Magasi and Porter, {Laura S.} and Reese, {Jennifer Barsky} and Reeve, {Bryce B.} and Shelby, {Rebecca A.} and Smith, {Ashley Wilder} and Willse, {John T.} and Flynn, {Kathryn E.}",
year = "2015",
month = "9",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1111/jsm.12966",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "12",
pages = "1961--1974",
journal = "Journal of Sexual Medicine",
issn = "1743-6095",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "9",

}

Weinfurt, KP, Lin, L, Bruner, DW, Cyranowski, JM, Dombeck, CB, Hahn, EA, Jeffery, DD, Luecht, RM, Magasi, S, Porter, LS, Reese, JB, Reeve, BB, Shelby, RA, Smith, AW, Willse, JT & Flynn, KE 2015, 'Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS® Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0', Journal of Sexual Medicine, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 1961-1974. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsm.12966

Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS® Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0. / Weinfurt, Kevin P.; Lin, Li; Bruner, Deborah Watkins; Cyranowski, Jill M.; Dombeck, Carrie B.; Hahn, Elizabeth A; Jeffery, Diana D.; Luecht, Richard M.; Magasi, Susan; Porter, Laura S.; Reese, Jennifer Barsky; Reeve, Bryce B.; Shelby, Rebecca A.; Smith, Ashley Wilder; Willse, John T.; Flynn, Kathryn E.

In: Journal of Sexual Medicine, Vol. 12, No. 9, 01.09.2015, p. 1961-1974.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS® Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0

AU - Weinfurt, Kevin P.

AU - Lin, Li

AU - Bruner, Deborah Watkins

AU - Cyranowski, Jill M.

AU - Dombeck, Carrie B.

AU - Hahn, Elizabeth A

AU - Jeffery, Diana D.

AU - Luecht, Richard M.

AU - Magasi, Susan

AU - Porter, Laura S.

AU - Reese, Jennifer Barsky

AU - Reeve, Bryce B.

AU - Shelby, Rebecca A.

AU - Smith, Ashley Wilder

AU - Willse, John T.

AU - Flynn, Kathryn E.

PY - 2015/9/1

Y1 - 2015/9/1

N2 - Introduction: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)® Sexual Function and Satisfaction measure (SexFS) version 1.0 was developed with cancer populations. There is a need to expand the SexFS and provide evidence of its validity in diverse populations. Aim: The aim of this study was to describe the development of the SexFS v2.0 and present preliminary evidence for its validity. Methods: Development built on version 1.0, plus additional review of extant items, discussions with 15 clinical experts, 11 patient focus groups (including individuals with diabetes, heart disease, anxiety, depression, and/or are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or aged 65 or older), 48 cognitive interviews, and psychometric evaluation in a random sample of U.S. adults plus an oversample for specific sexual problems (2281 men, 1686 women). We examined differential item functioning (DIF) by gender and sexual activity. We examined convergent and known-groups validity. Results: The final set of domains includes 11 scored scales (interest in sexual activity, lubrication, vaginal discomfort, clitoral discomfort, labial discomfort, erectile function, orgasm ability, orgasm pleasure, oral dryness, oral discomfort, satisfaction), and six nonscored item pools (screeners, sexual activities, anal discomfort, therapeutic aids, factors interfering with sexual satisfaction, bother). Domains from version 1.0 were reevaluated and improved. Domains considered applicable across gender and sexual activity status, namely interest, orgasm, and satisfaction, were found to have significant DIF. We identified subsets of items in each domain that provided consistent measurement across these important respondent groups. Convergent and known-groups validity was supported. Conclusions: The SexFS version 2.0 has several improvements and enhancements over version 1.0 and other extant measures, including expanded evidence for validity, scores centered around norms for sexually active U.S. adults, new domains, and a final set of items applicable for both men and women and those sexually active with a partner and without. The SexFS is customizable, allowing users to select relevant domains and items for their study. Weinfurt KP, Lin L, Bruner DW, Cyranowski JM, Dombeck CB, Hahn EA, Jeffery DD, Luecht RM, Magasi S, Porter LS, Reese JB, Reeve BB, Shelby RA, Smith AW, Willse JT, and Flynn KE. Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS® Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0. J Sex Med 2015;12:1961-1974.

AB - Introduction: The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)® Sexual Function and Satisfaction measure (SexFS) version 1.0 was developed with cancer populations. There is a need to expand the SexFS and provide evidence of its validity in diverse populations. Aim: The aim of this study was to describe the development of the SexFS v2.0 and present preliminary evidence for its validity. Methods: Development built on version 1.0, plus additional review of extant items, discussions with 15 clinical experts, 11 patient focus groups (including individuals with diabetes, heart disease, anxiety, depression, and/or are lesbian, gay, bisexual, or aged 65 or older), 48 cognitive interviews, and psychometric evaluation in a random sample of U.S. adults plus an oversample for specific sexual problems (2281 men, 1686 women). We examined differential item functioning (DIF) by gender and sexual activity. We examined convergent and known-groups validity. Results: The final set of domains includes 11 scored scales (interest in sexual activity, lubrication, vaginal discomfort, clitoral discomfort, labial discomfort, erectile function, orgasm ability, orgasm pleasure, oral dryness, oral discomfort, satisfaction), and six nonscored item pools (screeners, sexual activities, anal discomfort, therapeutic aids, factors interfering with sexual satisfaction, bother). Domains from version 1.0 were reevaluated and improved. Domains considered applicable across gender and sexual activity status, namely interest, orgasm, and satisfaction, were found to have significant DIF. We identified subsets of items in each domain that provided consistent measurement across these important respondent groups. Convergent and known-groups validity was supported. Conclusions: The SexFS version 2.0 has several improvements and enhancements over version 1.0 and other extant measures, including expanded evidence for validity, scores centered around norms for sexually active U.S. adults, new domains, and a final set of items applicable for both men and women and those sexually active with a partner and without. The SexFS is customizable, allowing users to select relevant domains and items for their study. Weinfurt KP, Lin L, Bruner DW, Cyranowski JM, Dombeck CB, Hahn EA, Jeffery DD, Luecht RM, Magasi S, Porter LS, Reese JB, Reeve BB, Shelby RA, Smith AW, Willse JT, and Flynn KE. Development and Initial Validation of the PROMIS® Sexual Function and Satisfaction Measures Version 2.0. J Sex Med 2015;12:1961-1974.

KW - Patient-Reported outcome measures

KW - Quality of life

KW - Sexual function

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84941878275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84941878275&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1111/jsm.12966

DO - 10.1111/jsm.12966

M3 - Article

VL - 12

SP - 1961

EP - 1974

JO - Journal of Sexual Medicine

JF - Journal of Sexual Medicine

SN - 1743-6095

IS - 9

ER -