Development and Validation of the Consumer Health Activation Index

Michael S. Wolf*, Samuel G. Smith, Anjali U. Pandit, David M. Condon, Laura M. Curtis, James Griffith, Rachel O’Conor, Steven Rush, Stacy C. Bailey, Gordon Kaplan, Vincent Haufle, David Martin

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background. Although there has been increasing interest in patient engagement, few measures are publicly available and suitable for patients with limited health literacy. Objective. We sought to develop a Consumer Health Activation Index (CHAI) for use among diverse patients. Methods. Expert opinion, a systematic literature review, focus groups, and cognitive interviews with patients were used to create and revise a potential set of items. Psychometric testing guided by item response theory was then conducted among 301 English-speaking, community-dwelling adults. This included differential item functioning analyses to evaluate item performance across participant health literacy levels. To determine construct validity, CHAI scores were compared to scales measuring similar personality constructs. Associations between the CHAI and physical and mental health established predictive validity. A second study among 9,478 adults was used to confirm CHAI associations with health outcomes. Results. Exploratory factor analyses revealed a single-factor solution with a 10-item scale. The CHAI showed good internal consistency (alpha = 0.81) and moderate test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.53). Reading grade level was found to be at the 6th grade. Moderate to strong correlations were found with similar constructs (Multidimensional Health Locus of Control, r = 0.38, P < 0.001; Conscientiousness, r = 0.41, P < 0.001). Predictive validity was demonstrated through associations with functional health status measures (depression, r = −0.28, P < 0.001; anxiety, r = −0.22, P < 0.001; and physical functioning, r = 0.22, P < 0.001). In the validation sample, the CHAI was significantly associated with self-reported physical and mental health (r = 0.31 and 0.32 respectively; both P < 0.001). Conclusions. The CHAI appears to be a valid, reliable, and easily administered tool that can be used to assess health activation among adults, including those with limited health literacy. Future studies should test the tool in actual use and explore further applications.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)334-343
Number of pages10
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume38
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2018

Fingerprint

Health
Health Literacy
Mental Health
Independent Living
Patient Participation
Internal-External Control
Expert Testimony
Focus Groups
Psychometrics
Health Status
Statistical Factor Analysis
Personality
Reading
Anxiety
Interviews
Depression

Keywords

  • engagement
  • health
  • healthcare
  • literacy
  • measurement
  • patient activation

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Policy

Cite this

Wolf, Michael S. ; Smith, Samuel G. ; Pandit, Anjali U. ; Condon, David M. ; Curtis, Laura M. ; Griffith, James ; O’Conor, Rachel ; Rush, Steven ; Bailey, Stacy C. ; Kaplan, Gordon ; Haufle, Vincent ; Martin, David. / Development and Validation of the Consumer Health Activation Index. In: Medical Decision Making. 2018 ; Vol. 38, No. 3. pp. 334-343.
@article{c3f1ea39ea3947aa9b457d0ab7d10c9a,
title = "Development and Validation of the Consumer Health Activation Index",
abstract = "Background. Although there has been increasing interest in patient engagement, few measures are publicly available and suitable for patients with limited health literacy. Objective. We sought to develop a Consumer Health Activation Index (CHAI) for use among diverse patients. Methods. Expert opinion, a systematic literature review, focus groups, and cognitive interviews with patients were used to create and revise a potential set of items. Psychometric testing guided by item response theory was then conducted among 301 English-speaking, community-dwelling adults. This included differential item functioning analyses to evaluate item performance across participant health literacy levels. To determine construct validity, CHAI scores were compared to scales measuring similar personality constructs. Associations between the CHAI and physical and mental health established predictive validity. A second study among 9,478 adults was used to confirm CHAI associations with health outcomes. Results. Exploratory factor analyses revealed a single-factor solution with a 10-item scale. The CHAI showed good internal consistency (alpha = 0.81) and moderate test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.53). Reading grade level was found to be at the 6th grade. Moderate to strong correlations were found with similar constructs (Multidimensional Health Locus of Control, r = 0.38, P < 0.001; Conscientiousness, r = 0.41, P < 0.001). Predictive validity was demonstrated through associations with functional health status measures (depression, r = −0.28, P < 0.001; anxiety, r = −0.22, P < 0.001; and physical functioning, r = 0.22, P < 0.001). In the validation sample, the CHAI was significantly associated with self-reported physical and mental health (r = 0.31 and 0.32 respectively; both P < 0.001). Conclusions. The CHAI appears to be a valid, reliable, and easily administered tool that can be used to assess health activation among adults, including those with limited health literacy. Future studies should test the tool in actual use and explore further applications.",
keywords = "engagement, health, healthcare, literacy, measurement, patient activation",
author = "Wolf, {Michael S.} and Smith, {Samuel G.} and Pandit, {Anjali U.} and Condon, {David M.} and Curtis, {Laura M.} and James Griffith and Rachel O’Conor and Steven Rush and Bailey, {Stacy C.} and Gordon Kaplan and Vincent Haufle and David Martin",
year = "2018",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0272989X17753392",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "334--343",
journal = "Medical Decision Making",
issn = "0272-989X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",
number = "3",

}

Development and Validation of the Consumer Health Activation Index. / Wolf, Michael S.; Smith, Samuel G.; Pandit, Anjali U.; Condon, David M.; Curtis, Laura M.; Griffith, James; O’Conor, Rachel; Rush, Steven; Bailey, Stacy C.; Kaplan, Gordon; Haufle, Vincent; Martin, David.

In: Medical Decision Making, Vol. 38, No. 3, 01.04.2018, p. 334-343.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Development and Validation of the Consumer Health Activation Index

AU - Wolf, Michael S.

AU - Smith, Samuel G.

AU - Pandit, Anjali U.

AU - Condon, David M.

AU - Curtis, Laura M.

AU - Griffith, James

AU - O’Conor, Rachel

AU - Rush, Steven

AU - Bailey, Stacy C.

AU - Kaplan, Gordon

AU - Haufle, Vincent

AU - Martin, David

PY - 2018/4/1

Y1 - 2018/4/1

N2 - Background. Although there has been increasing interest in patient engagement, few measures are publicly available and suitable for patients with limited health literacy. Objective. We sought to develop a Consumer Health Activation Index (CHAI) for use among diverse patients. Methods. Expert opinion, a systematic literature review, focus groups, and cognitive interviews with patients were used to create and revise a potential set of items. Psychometric testing guided by item response theory was then conducted among 301 English-speaking, community-dwelling adults. This included differential item functioning analyses to evaluate item performance across participant health literacy levels. To determine construct validity, CHAI scores were compared to scales measuring similar personality constructs. Associations between the CHAI and physical and mental health established predictive validity. A second study among 9,478 adults was used to confirm CHAI associations with health outcomes. Results. Exploratory factor analyses revealed a single-factor solution with a 10-item scale. The CHAI showed good internal consistency (alpha = 0.81) and moderate test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.53). Reading grade level was found to be at the 6th grade. Moderate to strong correlations were found with similar constructs (Multidimensional Health Locus of Control, r = 0.38, P < 0.001; Conscientiousness, r = 0.41, P < 0.001). Predictive validity was demonstrated through associations with functional health status measures (depression, r = −0.28, P < 0.001; anxiety, r = −0.22, P < 0.001; and physical functioning, r = 0.22, P < 0.001). In the validation sample, the CHAI was significantly associated with self-reported physical and mental health (r = 0.31 and 0.32 respectively; both P < 0.001). Conclusions. The CHAI appears to be a valid, reliable, and easily administered tool that can be used to assess health activation among adults, including those with limited health literacy. Future studies should test the tool in actual use and explore further applications.

AB - Background. Although there has been increasing interest in patient engagement, few measures are publicly available and suitable for patients with limited health literacy. Objective. We sought to develop a Consumer Health Activation Index (CHAI) for use among diverse patients. Methods. Expert opinion, a systematic literature review, focus groups, and cognitive interviews with patients were used to create and revise a potential set of items. Psychometric testing guided by item response theory was then conducted among 301 English-speaking, community-dwelling adults. This included differential item functioning analyses to evaluate item performance across participant health literacy levels. To determine construct validity, CHAI scores were compared to scales measuring similar personality constructs. Associations between the CHAI and physical and mental health established predictive validity. A second study among 9,478 adults was used to confirm CHAI associations with health outcomes. Results. Exploratory factor analyses revealed a single-factor solution with a 10-item scale. The CHAI showed good internal consistency (alpha = 0.81) and moderate test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.53). Reading grade level was found to be at the 6th grade. Moderate to strong correlations were found with similar constructs (Multidimensional Health Locus of Control, r = 0.38, P < 0.001; Conscientiousness, r = 0.41, P < 0.001). Predictive validity was demonstrated through associations with functional health status measures (depression, r = −0.28, P < 0.001; anxiety, r = −0.22, P < 0.001; and physical functioning, r = 0.22, P < 0.001). In the validation sample, the CHAI was significantly associated with self-reported physical and mental health (r = 0.31 and 0.32 respectively; both P < 0.001). Conclusions. The CHAI appears to be a valid, reliable, and easily administered tool that can be used to assess health activation among adults, including those with limited health literacy. Future studies should test the tool in actual use and explore further applications.

KW - engagement

KW - health

KW - healthcare

KW - literacy

KW - measurement

KW - patient activation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85042528824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85042528824&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0272989X17753392

DO - 10.1177/0272989X17753392

M3 - Article

VL - 38

SP - 334

EP - 343

JO - Medical Decision Making

JF - Medical Decision Making

SN - 0272-989X

IS - 3

ER -