Development of the flexibility in duty hour requirements for surgical trainees (FIRST) trial protocol a national cluster-randomized trial of resident duty hour policies

Karl Y. Bilimoria*, Jeanette W. Chung, Larry V. Hedges, Allison R. Dahlke, Remi Love, Mark E. Cohen, John Tarpley, John Mellinger, David M. Mahvi, Rachel R. Kelz, Clifford Y. Ko, David B. Hoyt, Frank H. Lewis

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

38 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance Debate continues regarding whether to further restrict resident duty hour policies, but little high-level evidence is available to guide policy changes. OBJECTIVE To inform decision making regarding duty hour policies, the Flexibility in Duty Hour Requirements for Surgical Trainees (FIRST) Trial is being conducted to evaluate whether changing resident duty hour policies to permit greater flexibility in work hours affects patient postoperative outcomes, resident education, and resident well-being. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Pragmatic noninferiority cluster-randomized trial of general surgery residency programs with 2 study arms. Participating in the study are Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-approved US general surgery residency programs (n = 118), their affiliated hospitals (n = 154), surgical residents and program directors, and general surgery patients from July 1, 2014, to June 30, 2015, with additional patient safety outcomes collected through June 30, 2016. The data collection platform for patient outcomes is the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP), thus only hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP were included. INTERVENTIONS In the usual care arm, programs adhered to current ACGME resident duty hour standards. In the intervention arm, programs were allowed to deviate from current standards regarding maximum shift lengths and minimum time off between shifts through an ACGME waiver. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Death or serious morbidity within 30 days of surgery measured through ACS NSQIP, as well as resident satisfaction and well-being measured through a survey delivered at the time of the 2015 American Board of Surgery in Training Examination (ABSITE). RESULTS A total of 118 general surgery residency programs and 154 hospitals were enrolled in the FIRST Trial and randomized. Fifty-nine programs (73 hospitals) were randomized to the usual care arm and 59 programs (81 hospitals) were randomized to the intervention arm. Intent-to-treat analysis will be used to estimate the effectiveness of assignment to the intervention arm on patient outcomes, resident education, and resident well-being compared with the usual care arm. Several sensitivity analyses will be performed to determine whether there were differential effects when examining only inpatients, high-risk patients, and emergent/urgent cases. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE To our knowledge, the FIRST Trial is the first national randomized clinical trial of duty hour policies. Results of this study may be informative to policymakers and other stakeholders engaged in restructuring graduate medical training to enhance the quality of patient care and resident education.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)273-281
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA surgery
Volume151
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2016

    Fingerprint

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Cite this