Abstract
Purpose: To compare the diffusion-weighted imaging of nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations of the orbit with that of other histologically-proven orbital tumors. Design: Retrospective case-control study. Methods: Patients with nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations of the orbit and patients with other histologically-proven orbital tumors were selected for chart review. The main outcome measure was the apparent diffusion coefficient of these lesions. Results: Sixty-seven patients qualified for chart review; 9 patients had nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations and 58 patients had other histologically-proven tumors. Three of the 9 patients with nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations were initially misdiagnosed as having had solid orbital tumors. The mean apparent diffusion coefficient of distensible venous malformations was 2.80 ± 0.48 × 10−3 mm2/s, whereas the mean apparent diffusion coefficient of other histologically-proven tumors was 1.18 ± 0.39 × 10−3 mm2/s (P <.001). The mean apparent diffusion coefficient ranged from 2.42 to 3.94 × 10−3 mm2/s in the distensible venous malformation group, whereas other histologically-proven tumors ranged from 0.53 to 2.08 × 10−3 mm2/s. Therefore, in this single-institution series, a threshold value of 2.10 × 10−3 mm2/s was 100% sensitive and 100% specific for distensible venous malformations. Conclusion: Certain nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations can evade diagnostic suspicion and mimic solid orbital tumors on standard magnetic resonance imaging sequences. In this single-institution series, diffusion-weighted imaging effectively distinguished these nonthrombosed distensible venous malformations from other orbital tumors.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 146-154 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | American journal of ophthalmology |
Volume | 189 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - May 2018 |
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Ophthalmology