TY - JOUR
T1 - Diagnostic Accuracy of the Veteran Affairs’ Traumatic Brain Injury Screen
AU - Pape, Theresa Louise Bender
AU - Smith, Bridget
AU - Babcock-Parziale, Judith
AU - Evans, Charlesnika T.
AU - Herrold, Amy A.
AU - Phipps Maieritsch, Kelly
AU - High, Walter M.
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by a Service-Directed Research Award (no. 08-377) from the United States Department of Veterans Affairs Health Services Research and Development Service. The contents of this manuscript do not represent the views of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs or the United States Government.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/7
Y1 - 2018/7
N2 - Objective: To comprehensively estimate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS). Design: Cross-sectional, prospective, observational study using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy criteria. Setting: Three VA Polytrauma Network Sites. Participants: Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom veterans (N=433). Main Outcome Measures: TCRS, Comprehensive TBI Evaluation, Structured TBI Diagnostic Interview, Symptom Attribution and Classification Algorithm, and Clinician-Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale. Results: Forty-five percent of veterans screened positive on the TCRS for TBI. For detecting occurrence of historical TBI, the TCRS had a sensitivity of.56 to.74, a specificity of.63 to.93, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 25% to 45%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91% to 94%, and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 4 to 13. For accuracy of attributing active symptoms to the TBI, the TCRS had a sensitivity of.64 to.87, a specificity of.59 to.89, a PPV of 26% to 32%, an NPV of 92% to 95%, and a DOR of 6 to 9. The sensitivity was higher for veterans with PTSD (.80–.86) relative to veterans without PTSD (.57–.82). The specificity, however, was higher among veterans without PTSD (.75–.81) relative to veterans with PTSD (.36–.49). All indices of diagnostic accuracy changed when participants with questionably valid (QV) test profiles were eliminated from analyses. Conclusions: The utility of the TCRS to screen for mild TBI (mTBI) depends on the stringency of the diagnostic reference standard to which it is being compared, the presence/absence of PTSD, and QV test profiles. Further development, validation, and use of reproducible diagnostic algorithms for symptom attribution after possible mTBI would improve diagnostic accuracy.
AB - Objective: To comprehensively estimate the diagnostic accuracy and reliability of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Clinical Reminder Screen (TCRS). Design: Cross-sectional, prospective, observational study using the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy criteria. Setting: Three VA Polytrauma Network Sites. Participants: Operation Iraqi Freedom, Operation Enduring Freedom veterans (N=433). Main Outcome Measures: TCRS, Comprehensive TBI Evaluation, Structured TBI Diagnostic Interview, Symptom Attribution and Classification Algorithm, and Clinician-Administered Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) Scale. Results: Forty-five percent of veterans screened positive on the TCRS for TBI. For detecting occurrence of historical TBI, the TCRS had a sensitivity of.56 to.74, a specificity of.63 to.93, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 25% to 45%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 91% to 94%, and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of 4 to 13. For accuracy of attributing active symptoms to the TBI, the TCRS had a sensitivity of.64 to.87, a specificity of.59 to.89, a PPV of 26% to 32%, an NPV of 92% to 95%, and a DOR of 6 to 9. The sensitivity was higher for veterans with PTSD (.80–.86) relative to veterans without PTSD (.57–.82). The specificity, however, was higher among veterans without PTSD (.75–.81) relative to veterans with PTSD (.36–.49). All indices of diagnostic accuracy changed when participants with questionably valid (QV) test profiles were eliminated from analyses. Conclusions: The utility of the TCRS to screen for mild TBI (mTBI) depends on the stringency of the diagnostic reference standard to which it is being compared, the presence/absence of PTSD, and QV test profiles. Further development, validation, and use of reproducible diagnostic algorithms for symptom attribution after possible mTBI would improve diagnostic accuracy.
KW - Brain injuries, traumatic
KW - Mass screening
KW - Rehabilitation
KW - Sensitivity and specificity
KW - Veterans
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85043475190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85043475190&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.017
DO - 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.11.017
M3 - Article
C2 - 29355506
AN - SCOPUS:85043475190
SN - 0003-9993
VL - 99
SP - 1370
EP - 1382
JO - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
JF - Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
IS - 7
ER -