Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Lead to Risky Lending?

Sumit Agarwal, Efraim Benmelech, Nittai K. Bergman, Amit Seru

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Yes, it did. We use exogenous variation in banks' incentives to conform to the standards of the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) around regulatory exam dates to trace out the effect of the CRA on lending activity. Our empirical strategy compares lending behavior of banks undergoing CRA exams within a given census tract in a given month to the behavior of banks operating in the same census tract-month that do not face these exams. We find that adherence to the act led to riskier lending by banks: in the six quarters surrounding the CRA exams lending is elevated on average by about 5 percent every quarter and loans in these quarters default by about 15 percent more often. These patterns are accentuated in CRA-eligible census tracts and are concentrated among large banks. The effects are strongest during the time period when the market for private securitization was booming.
Original languageEnglish (US)
PublisherNational Bureau of Economic Research (NBER)
DOIs
StatePublished - 2012

Publication series

Name
No.18609

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Lead to Risky Lending?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Agarwal, S., Benmelech, E., Bergman, N. K., & Seru, A. (2012). Did the Community Reinvestment Act (CRA) Lead to Risky Lending? National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER). https://doi.org/10.3386/w18609