Differential diagnosis of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome with psychosis: Practical and ethical issues

Cindy K. Westergaard*, Cindy J. Nowinski, Jerry J. Sweet

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

The present case illustrates practical and ethical issues that can be encountered by clinical psychologists providing consultation services in medical settings. The neuropsychological consultation service was asked to evaluate a 22-year-old male with psychosis, steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, and a family history of schizophrenia. MRI revealed marked cortical atrophy. Clinical findings were consistent with (1) steroid induced apparent atrophy, which has been shown to be reversible with withdrawal of steroids; (2) uremia secondary to steroid withdrawal; (3) cortical atrophy, found in some schizophrenics; or (4) an atypical, diffuse degenerative disorder. Clinical interview and psychological testing revealed significant thought disorder, prominent delusions, somatic hallucinations, and mood disturbance. Deterioration in social and academic functioning was also present. Except for impaired attention and concentration, neuropsychological evaluation showed no clear evidence of brain-based dysfunction. Further, neuropsychological results effectively ruled out a degenerative process and were not consistent with a steroid effects profile. A conclusive differential diagnosis of steroid induced psychosis versus severe psychopathology would require withdrawal from steroids and antipsychotics. In addition to the practical and ethical issues of withholding antipsychotics, steroid withdrawal would require either dialysis or renal transplant surgery. Decision making regarding dialysis dependency and the possibility of postsurgical psychosis secondary to true psychopathology were salient issues to both the patient and the treatment team.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)11-21
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings
Volume3
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1996

Fingerprint

Nephrotic Syndrome
Ethics
Psychotic Disorders
Differential Diagnosis
Steroids
Atrophy
Psychopathology
Antipsychotic Agents
Psychological Interviews
Referral and Consultation
Delusions
Uremia
Hallucinations
Renal Dialysis
Dialysis
Schizophrenia
Decision Making
Psychology
Transplants
Brain

Keywords

  • Dementia
  • Nephrotic syndrome
  • Schizophrenia
  • Steroid dependency
  • Uremia

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Clinical Psychology

Cite this

@article{aa2dd00dea154e5186639270bd53ed1c,
title = "Differential diagnosis of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome with psychosis: Practical and ethical issues",
abstract = "The present case illustrates practical and ethical issues that can be encountered by clinical psychologists providing consultation services in medical settings. The neuropsychological consultation service was asked to evaluate a 22-year-old male with psychosis, steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, and a family history of schizophrenia. MRI revealed marked cortical atrophy. Clinical findings were consistent with (1) steroid induced apparent atrophy, which has been shown to be reversible with withdrawal of steroids; (2) uremia secondary to steroid withdrawal; (3) cortical atrophy, found in some schizophrenics; or (4) an atypical, diffuse degenerative disorder. Clinical interview and psychological testing revealed significant thought disorder, prominent delusions, somatic hallucinations, and mood disturbance. Deterioration in social and academic functioning was also present. Except for impaired attention and concentration, neuropsychological evaluation showed no clear evidence of brain-based dysfunction. Further, neuropsychological results effectively ruled out a degenerative process and were not consistent with a steroid effects profile. A conclusive differential diagnosis of steroid induced psychosis versus severe psychopathology would require withdrawal from steroids and antipsychotics. In addition to the practical and ethical issues of withholding antipsychotics, steroid withdrawal would require either dialysis or renal transplant surgery. Decision making regarding dialysis dependency and the possibility of postsurgical psychosis secondary to true psychopathology were salient issues to both the patient and the treatment team.",
keywords = "Dementia, Nephrotic syndrome, Schizophrenia, Steroid dependency, Uremia",
author = "Westergaard, {Cindy K.} and Nowinski, {Cindy J.} and Sweet, {Jerry J.}",
year = "1996",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1007/BF01989286",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "3",
pages = "11--21",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings",
issn = "1068-9583",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "1",

}

Differential diagnosis of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome with psychosis : Practical and ethical issues. / Westergaard, Cindy K.; Nowinski, Cindy J.; Sweet, Jerry J.

In: Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, Vol. 3, No. 1, 01.01.1996, p. 11-21.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Differential diagnosis of steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome with psychosis

T2 - Practical and ethical issues

AU - Westergaard, Cindy K.

AU - Nowinski, Cindy J.

AU - Sweet, Jerry J.

PY - 1996/1/1

Y1 - 1996/1/1

N2 - The present case illustrates practical and ethical issues that can be encountered by clinical psychologists providing consultation services in medical settings. The neuropsychological consultation service was asked to evaluate a 22-year-old male with psychosis, steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, and a family history of schizophrenia. MRI revealed marked cortical atrophy. Clinical findings were consistent with (1) steroid induced apparent atrophy, which has been shown to be reversible with withdrawal of steroids; (2) uremia secondary to steroid withdrawal; (3) cortical atrophy, found in some schizophrenics; or (4) an atypical, diffuse degenerative disorder. Clinical interview and psychological testing revealed significant thought disorder, prominent delusions, somatic hallucinations, and mood disturbance. Deterioration in social and academic functioning was also present. Except for impaired attention and concentration, neuropsychological evaluation showed no clear evidence of brain-based dysfunction. Further, neuropsychological results effectively ruled out a degenerative process and were not consistent with a steroid effects profile. A conclusive differential diagnosis of steroid induced psychosis versus severe psychopathology would require withdrawal from steroids and antipsychotics. In addition to the practical and ethical issues of withholding antipsychotics, steroid withdrawal would require either dialysis or renal transplant surgery. Decision making regarding dialysis dependency and the possibility of postsurgical psychosis secondary to true psychopathology were salient issues to both the patient and the treatment team.

AB - The present case illustrates practical and ethical issues that can be encountered by clinical psychologists providing consultation services in medical settings. The neuropsychological consultation service was asked to evaluate a 22-year-old male with psychosis, steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome, and a family history of schizophrenia. MRI revealed marked cortical atrophy. Clinical findings were consistent with (1) steroid induced apparent atrophy, which has been shown to be reversible with withdrawal of steroids; (2) uremia secondary to steroid withdrawal; (3) cortical atrophy, found in some schizophrenics; or (4) an atypical, diffuse degenerative disorder. Clinical interview and psychological testing revealed significant thought disorder, prominent delusions, somatic hallucinations, and mood disturbance. Deterioration in social and academic functioning was also present. Except for impaired attention and concentration, neuropsychological evaluation showed no clear evidence of brain-based dysfunction. Further, neuropsychological results effectively ruled out a degenerative process and were not consistent with a steroid effects profile. A conclusive differential diagnosis of steroid induced psychosis versus severe psychopathology would require withdrawal from steroids and antipsychotics. In addition to the practical and ethical issues of withholding antipsychotics, steroid withdrawal would require either dialysis or renal transplant surgery. Decision making regarding dialysis dependency and the possibility of postsurgical psychosis secondary to true psychopathology were salient issues to both the patient and the treatment team.

KW - Dementia

KW - Nephrotic syndrome

KW - Schizophrenia

KW - Steroid dependency

KW - Uremia

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=25444475047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=25444475047&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/BF01989286

DO - 10.1007/BF01989286

M3 - Article

C2 - 24226529

AN - SCOPUS:25444475047

VL - 3

SP - 11

EP - 21

JO - Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

JF - Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings

SN - 1068-9583

IS - 1

ER -